These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24422035)

  • 41. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Measured X-ray Spectra and Absorbed Dose Conversion Factors in a Water Equivalent Phantom Irradiated with Diagnostic X-rays].
    Aoki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(10):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30344211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Optimal beam quality for chest digital radiography].
    Oda N; Tabata Y; Nakano T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 25410333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Absorbed dose measurements for kV-cone beam computed tomography in image-guided radiation therapy.
    Hioki K; Araki F; Ohno T; Nakaguchi Y; Tomiyama Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(23):7297-313. PubMed ID: 25383908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality.
    Huda W; Lieberman KA; Chang J; Roskopf ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 15070259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of x-ray tube potential on image quality and patient dose for lumbar spine computed radiography examinations.
    Brindhaban A; Al Khalifah K; Al Wathiqi G; Al Ostath H
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Dec; 28(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 16506618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of radiographic and clinical diagnosis of approximal and occlusal dental caries in a young adult population.
    Hopcraft MS; Morgan MV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Jun; 33(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 15853844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography.
    Oda N; Nakata H; Murakami S; Terada K; Nakamura K; Yoshida A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Mar; 31(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 8675419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Does dose optimisation in digital panoramic radiography affect diagnostic performance?
    Martins LAC; Brasil DM; Forner LA; Viccari C; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Oliveira ML
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Feb; 25(2):637-643. PubMed ID: 32845471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Red bone marrow doses, integral absorbed doses, and somatically effective dose equivalent from four maxillary occlusal projections.
    Berge TI; Wøhni T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6583630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Surface and internal absorbed doses in mandibular and maxillary occlusal radiography.
    Roth SF; Bohay RN; Barnett RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Nov; 61(11):955-9. PubMed ID: 8521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measurement of radiation dose in cerebral CT perfusion study.
    Hirata M; Sugawara Y; Fukutomi Y; Oomoto K; Murase K; Miki H; Mochizuki T
    Radiat Med; 2005 Mar; 23(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 15827526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector.
    Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG; Hollender L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8508938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Optimization of radiographic parameters for paediatric cardiac angiography.
    Onnasch DG; Schemm A; Kramer HH
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 77(918):479-87. PubMed ID: 15151968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.