These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24422345)
1. Design and test of a situation-augmented display for an unmanned aerial vehicle monitoring task. Lu JL; Horng RY; Chao CJ Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Aug; 117(1):1187-207. PubMed ID: 24422345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mission control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles: a workload analysis. Dixon SR; Wickens CD; Chang D Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):479-87. PubMed ID: 16435690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting automation failures in a simulated supervisory control environment. Foroughi CK; Sibley C; Brown NL; Rovira E; Pak R; Coyne JT Ergonomics; 2019 Sep; 62(9):1150-1161. PubMed ID: 31179874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Highways in the Sky and a virtual pad for landing Head Up Display symbology to enable improved helicopter pilots situation awareness and workload in degraded visual conditions. Stanton NA; Plant KL; Roberts AP; Allison CK Ergonomics; 2019 Feb; 62(2):255-267. PubMed ID: 29206624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Petri net-based modelling of human-automation conflicts in aviation. Pizziol S; Tessier C; Dehais F Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 24444329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance. Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A meta-analysis of human-system interfaces in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarm management. Hocraffer A; Nam CS Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():66-80. PubMed ID: 27633199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Touch, Voice, and Multimodal Input, and Task Load on Multiple-UAV Monitoring Performance During Simulated Manned-Unmanned Teaming in a Military Helicopter. Levulis SJ; DeLucia PR; Kim SY Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 60(8):1117-1129. PubMed ID: 30063411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical modelling of networked human-automation performance using working memory capacity. Ahmed N; de Visser E; Shaw T; Mohamed-Ameen A; Campbell M; Parasuraman R Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):295-318. PubMed ID: 24308716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automation reliability in unmanned aerial vehicle control: a reliance-compliance model of automation dependence in high workload. Dixon SR; Wickens CD Hum Factors; 2006; 48(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 17063963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content. McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vigilance and Automation Dependence in Operation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS): A Simulation Study. Wohleber RW; Matthews G; Lin J; Szalma JL; Calhoun GL; Funke GJ; Chiu CP; Ruff HA Hum Factors; 2019 May; 61(3):488-505. PubMed ID: 30265579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automation in future air traffic management: effects of decision aid reliability on controller performance and mental workload. Metzger U; Parasuraman R Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 15960085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems. Parasuraman R; Mouloua M; Molloy R Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):665-79. PubMed ID: 11536753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Endsley MR; Kaber DB Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation. Bailey NR; Scerbo MW; Freeman FG; Mikulka PJ; Scott LA Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):693-709. PubMed ID: 17240718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overload and automation-dependence in a multi-UAS simulation: Task demand and individual difference factors. Lin J; Matthews G; Wohleber RW; Funke GJ; Calhoun GL; Ruff HA; Szalma J; Chiu P J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):218-235. PubMed ID: 31621357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing operator capacity estimates for supervisory control of autonomous vehicles. Cummings ML; Guerlain S Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17315838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory decision aiding in supervisory control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles. Donmez B; Cummings ML; Graham HD Hum Factors; 2009 Oct; 51(5):718-29. PubMed ID: 20196296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Miller CA; Parasuraman R Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 17315844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]