These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24422703)

  • 1. Analysis of three factors possibly influencing the outcome of a science review process.
    Araujo J; Ghiya ND; Calugar A; Popovic T
    Account Res; 2014; 21(4):241-64. PubMed ID: 24422703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact, orthodoxy and peer review.
    Ritter JM
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 72(3):367-8. PubMed ID: 21824176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary on Cicchetti's "reliability of peer review".
    Colliver JA
    Teach Learn Med; 2002; 14(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 12189632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Counterpoint: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation.
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2007 Feb; 21(2):309-10; discussion 311. PubMed ID: 17267384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy.
    Vanchieri C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Nov; 89(21):1568-9. PubMed ID: 9362150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Point: Statistical analysis in NIH peer review--identifying innovation.
    Kaplan D
    FASEB J; 2007 Feb; 21(2):305-8. PubMed ID: 17267383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].
    Stijntjes F; Veeken H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(16):934-7. PubMed ID: 18561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peering into peer review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and advancing our professional evolution.
    Biddle C
    AANA J; 2011 Oct; 79(5):365-6. PubMed ID: 23256263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the surgery literature: can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow?
    Sosa JA; Mehta P; Thomas DC; Berland G; Gross C; McNamara RL; Rosenthal R; Udelsman R; Bravata DM; Roman SA
    Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 19561471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations.
    Winker K
    Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):400-2. PubMed ID: 21538415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.
    Pendlebury DA
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19219526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The dark side of science].
    Calcagno V; Demoinet E
    Med Sci (Paris); 2013 Feb; 29(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 23452610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review perspective for early career psychiatrists.
    Gelenberg AJ
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599. PubMed ID: 20031101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts.
    Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome M
    West J Nurs Res; 2011 Jun; 33(4):506-21. PubMed ID: 21078915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The changing face of peer review at the National Institutes of Health.
    Leppert PC
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 14967360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science behind reviewing.
    Marusic A
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):656-8. PubMed ID: 23758003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer Review Initiatives in Nepal.
    Hamal PK; Dangal G
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Oct; 16(3):I. PubMed ID: 30455480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. June 28 set as deadline for submitting criteria for peer review of HMO quality.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Jun; 15(13):68. PubMed ID: 10300142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.