These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24422922)
41. The core competencies: addressing yesterday's challenges? Hynds JA Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 23391054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics Consultation. Magnus D Am J Bioeth; 2016; 16(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 26913650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Response: Narcissus meets Pandora. Scofield G J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(3):243-4. PubMed ID: 11210376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Bioethics testimony: untangling the strands and testing their reliability. Spielman BJ J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 16083081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Validating interpretive arguments for licensure and certification examinations. Kane MT Eval Health Prof; 1994 Jun; 17(2):133-59; discussion 236-41. PubMed ID: 10134545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Case Complexity and Quality Attestation for Clinical Ethics Consultants. Spielman B; Craig J; Gorka C; Miller K J Clin Ethics; 2015; 26(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 26399673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Certifying clinical ethics consultants: who pays? Burda M J Clin Ethics; 2011; 22(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 21837895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Two Troubling Trends in the Conversation Over Whether Clinical Ethics Consultants Have Ethics Expertise. Brummett A; Ostertag CJ HEC Forum; 2018 Jun; 30(2):157-169. PubMed ID: 28421331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The "quality attestation" process and the risk of the false positive. Fiester A Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; 44(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 24821249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical Ethicists Have an Ethical Obligation to Create Professional Standards and a National Certification Process. Kon AA Am J Bioeth; 2016; 16(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 26913656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Quality in ethics consultations. Magill G Med Health Care Philos; 2013 Nov; 16(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 23709338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An ongoing conversation: the Task Force report and bioethics consultation. Aulisio MP; Arnold RM; Youngner SJ J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 11645165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The ASBH code of ethics and the limits of professional healthcare ethics consultations. Schwab A J Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 42(8):504-9. PubMed ID: 27169708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Rebuttal: expert ethics testimony. Baylis F J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 11210375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Activities, not rules: the need for responsive practice (on the way toward responsibility). Finder SG; Bliton MJ Am J Bioeth; 2001; 1(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 11954642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Research on standards for professional licensure and certification examinations. Norcini JJ Eval Health Prof; 1994 Jun; 17(2):160-77; discussion 236-41. PubMed ID: 10134546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]