168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24423445)
21. Validation of the Web-Based IBTR! 2.0 Nomogram to Predict for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy.
Kindts I; Laenen A; Peeters S; Janssen H; Depuydt T; Nevelsteen I; Van Limbergen E; Weltens C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 27315662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Estimating the concordance probability in a survival analysis with a discrete number of risk groups.
Heller G; Mo Q
Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Apr; 22(2):263-79. PubMed ID: 26022558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An empirical comparison of several clustered data approaches under confounding due to cluster effects in the analysis of complications of coronary angioplasty.
Berlin JA; Kimmel SE; Ten Have TR; Sammel MD
Biometrics; 1999 Jun; 55(2):470-6. PubMed ID: 11318202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of heterogeneity in an individual participant data meta-analysis of prediction models: An overview and illustration.
Steyerberg EW; Nieboer D; Debray TPA; van Houwelingen HC
Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(22):4290-4309. PubMed ID: 31373722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatially varying effects of predictors for the survival prediction of nonmetastatic colorectal Cancer.
Tian Y; Li J; Zhou T; Tong D; Chi S; Kong X; Ding K; Li J
BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1084. PubMed ID: 30409119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 1998 Apr; 17(8):841-56. PubMed ID: 9595615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.
Gómez PA; de-la-Cruz J; Lora D; Jiménez-Roldán L; Rodríguez-Boto G; Sarabia R; Sahuquillo J; Lastra R; Morera J; Lazo E; Dominguez J; Ibañez J; Brell M; de-la-Lama A; Lobato RD; Lagares A
J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121(6):1314-22. PubMed ID: 25237737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The design and analysis of paired cluster randomized trials: an application of meta-analysis techniques.
Thompson SG; Pyke SD; Hardy RJ
Stat Med; 1997 Sep; 16(18):2063-79. PubMed ID: 9308132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
Bakbergenuly I; Hoaglin DC; Kulinskaya E
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):426-442. PubMed ID: 32112619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of exposure differences on city-to-city heterogeneity in PM
Baxter LK; Crooks JL; Sacks JD
Environ Health; 2017 Jan; 16(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score.
Arpino B; Cannas M
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2074-91. PubMed ID: 26833893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optimizing the prediction of perioperative mortality in vascular surgery by using a customized probability model.
Kertai MD; Boersma E; Klein J; van Sambeek M; Schouten O; van Urk H; Poldermans D
Arch Intern Med; 2005 Apr; 165(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 15851641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Marginal structural models for multilevel clustered data.
Wu Y; Langworthy B; Wang M
Biostatistics; 2022 Oct; 23(4):1056-1073. PubMed ID: 35904119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correction for bias in meta-analysis of little-replicated studies.
Doncaster CP; Spake R
Methods Ecol Evol; 2018 Mar; 9(3):634-644. PubMed ID: 29938012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of the CRASH model in the prediction of 18-month mortality and unfavorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.
Honeybul S; Ho KM; Lind CR; Gillett GR
J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 24605836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The potential of clustering methods to define intersection test scenarios: Assessing real-life performance of AEB.
Sander U; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():1-11. PubMed ID: 29355748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Aspirin for prophylactic use in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and overview of reviews.
Sutcliffe P; Connock M; Gurung T; Freeman K; Johnson S; Kandala NB; Grove A; Gurung B; Morrow S; Clarke A
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Sep; 17(43):1-253. PubMed ID: 24074752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses.
Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH; Griffith LE
Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11914297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
