122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24424120)
1. Managing clinically significant findings in research: the UK10K example.
Kaye J; Hurles M; Griffin H; Grewal J; Bobrow M; Timpson N; Smee C; Bolton P; Durbin R; Dyke S; Fitzpatrick D; Kennedy K; Kent A; Muddyman D; Muntoni F; Raymond LF; Semple R; Spector T;
Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Sep; 22(9):1100-4. PubMed ID: 24424120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Pop-Up' Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K.
Kaye J; Muddyman D; Smee C; Kennedy K; Bell J;
Life Sci Soc Policy; 2015; 11():10. PubMed ID: 26412243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic medicine: it is time to act.
Leighton J; Stacey J; Brennan P
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2018 Aug; 79(8):426. PubMed ID: 30070950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Medical genetics and the genome].
Gerdes AM; Vogel I
Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Nov; 176(46):. PubMed ID: 25394930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Managing outside information: creating an internal plan for externally generated information.
Kohn D
J AHIMA; 2010 Mar; 81(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 20369661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical issues in medical-sequencing research: implications of genotype-phenotype studies for individuals and populations.
Foster MW; Sharp RR
Hum Mol Genet; 2006 Apr; 15 Spec No 1():R45-9. PubMed ID: 16651368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research in the wild.
Van Hoyweghen I; Penders B
Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7169):478. PubMed ID: 18033273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should genetic findings from genome research be reported back to the participants?
Steinsbekk KS; Solberg B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Oct; 132(19):2190-3. PubMed ID: 23243670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Considering the Benefits and Risks of Research Participants' Access to Sequence Data.
Haga SB; Friedman B; Richard G
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Dec; 21(12):717-721. PubMed ID: 29045186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suitability of customer relationship management systems for the management of study participants in biomedical research.
Schwanke J; Rienhoff O; Schulze TG; Nussbeck SY
Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):340-50. PubMed ID: 23877579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expect the unexpected: screening for secondary findings in clinical genomics research.
Mackley MP; Capps B
Br Med Bull; 2017 Jun; 122(1):109-122. PubMed ID: 28398474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organizational challenges in clinical genomic research.
Altshuler JS; Altshuler D
Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):478-81. PubMed ID: 15164075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Jarvik GP; Amendola LM; Berg JS; Brothers K; Clayton EW; Chung W; Evans BJ; Evans JP; Fullerton SM; Gallego CJ; Garrison NA; Gray SW; Holm IA; Kullo IJ; Lehmann LS; McCarty C; Prows CA; Rehm HL; Sharp RR; Salama J; Sanderson S; Van Driest SL; Williams MS; Wolf SM; Wolf WA; ; ; Burke W
Am J Hum Genet; 2014 Jun; 94(6):818-26. PubMed ID: 24814192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incidental findings and ancillary-care obligations.
Richardson HS
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):256-70, 211. PubMed ID: 18547193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey study.
Lemke AA; Bick D; Dimmock D; Simpson P; Veith R
Clin Genet; 2013 Sep; 84(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 23163796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bosnian and Herzegovinian medical scientists in PubMed database.
Masic I
Med Arch; 2013; 67(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 24341067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A decade's perspective on DNA sequencing technology.
Mardis ER
Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7333):198-203. PubMed ID: 21307932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The potential of HIEs as infomediaries.
de Brantes F; Emery DW; Overhage JM; Glaser J; Marchibroda J
J Healthc Inf Manag; 2007; 21(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17299928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidental variants are critical for genomics.
Biesecker LG
Am J Hum Genet; 2013 May; 92(5):648-51. PubMed ID: 23643378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
