These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

701 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24424560)

  • 21. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
    Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dose reduction for chest CT: comparison of two iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Pourjabbar S; Singh S; Kulkarni N; Muse V; Digumarthy SR; Khawaja RD; Padole A; Do S; Kalra MK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 24948790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abdominal CT: an intra-individual comparison between virtual monochromatic spectral and polychromatic 120-kVp images obtained during the same examination.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25015416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation dose reduction for chest CT with non-linear adaptive filters.
    Singh S; Digumarthy SR; Back A; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23185071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Leipsic J; Nguyen G; Brown J; Sin D; Mayo JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 20966312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Low-dose abdominal CT: comparison of low tube voltage with moderate-level iterative reconstruction and standard tube voltage, low tube current with high-level iterative reconstruction.
    Kidoh M; Nakaura T; Nakamura S; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Sakai Y; Harada K; Yamashita Y
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Oct; 68(10):1008-15. PubMed ID: 23796210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.
    Marin D; Nelson RC; Schindera ST; Richard S; Youngblood RS; Yoshizumi TT; Samei E
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 20032149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hybrid iterative reconstruction technique for abdominal CT protocols in obese patients: assessment of image quality, radiation dose, and low-contrast detectability in a phantom.
    Schindera ST; Odedra D; Mercer D; Thipphavong S; Chou P; Szucs-Farkas Z; Rogalla P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):W146-52. PubMed ID: 24450696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.
    Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Advanced modelled iterative reconstruction for abdominal CT: qualitative and quantitative evaluation.
    Gordic S; Desbiolles L; Stolzmann P; Gantner L; Leschka S; Husarik DB; Alkadhi H
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Dec; 69(12):e497-504. PubMed ID: 25239788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient dose and image quality in low-dose abdominal CT: a comparison between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
    Kataria B; Smedby O
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Jun; 54(5):540-8. PubMed ID: 23474768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dose-modified 256-MDCT of the abdomen using low tube current and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
    Fuentes-Orrego JM; Hayano K; Kambadakone AR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1405-12. PubMed ID: 24119353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR) Part2: The chest.
    Mueck FG; Michael L; Deak Z; Scherr MK; Maxien D; Geyer LL; Reiser M; Wirth S
    Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):644-54. PubMed ID: 23696019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go?
    Husarik DB; Marin D; Samei E; Richard S; Chen B; Jaffe TA; Bashir MR; Nelson RC
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):468-74. PubMed ID: 22717881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ultra low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection: comparison of 80-, 100- and 120 kVp protocols in a prospective randomized study.
    Khawaja RD; Singh S; Madan R; Sharma A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1934-44. PubMed ID: 25063211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go?
    Kulkarni NM; Uppot RN; Eisner BH; Sahani DV
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 22891359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved image quality in dual-energy abdominal CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction in image space and filtered back projection reconstruction.
    Wang R; Yu W; Wu R; Yang H; Lu D; Liu J; Zhang Z; Zhang C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):402-6. PubMed ID: 22826403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D versus filtered back projection in CT: evaluation of image quality.
    Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1291-7. PubMed ID: 24261369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction of low-dose chest CT: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Digumarthy S; Do S; Pien H; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Shepard JA; Persson A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W235-44. PubMed ID: 23883238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.