These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24427795)

  • 1. Comparison of near vision, intraocular lens movement, and depth of focus with accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Dhital A; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1872-8. PubMed ID: 24427795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Beiko GHH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jan; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23098630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Zamora-Alejo KV; Moore SP; Parker DG; Ullrich K; Esterman A; Goggin M
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 29(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23380415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation.
    Macsai MS; Padnick-Silver L; Fontes BM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):628-33. PubMed ID: 16698485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population.
    Son HS; Kim SH; Auffarth GU; Choi CY
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):187. PubMed ID: 31426775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial.
    Cumming JS; Colvard DM; Dell SJ; Doane J; Fine IH; Hoffman RS; Packer M; Slade SG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):812-25. PubMed ID: 16765800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual performances with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract.
    Mesci C; Erbil HH; Olgun A; Yaylali SA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 20691422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens.
    Alió JL; Plaza-Puche AB; Montalban R; Javaloy J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):978-85. PubMed ID: 22624896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synchrony dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens. Part 2: pilot clinical evaluation.
    Ossma IL; Galvis A; Vargas LG; Trager MJ; Vagefi MR; McLeod SD
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 17189792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wavefront aberrations, depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: fellow-eye study.
    Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Boyce J; Saha S; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19304086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study.
    Rocha KM; Soriano ES; Chamon W; Chalita MR; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):2050-4. PubMed ID: 17445897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective measurement of intraocular lens movement and dioptric change with a focus shift accommodating intraocular lens.
    Hancox J; Spalton D; Heatley C; Jayaram H; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1098-103. PubMed ID: 16857494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Nov; 150(5):619-627.e1. PubMed ID: 20719298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of the visual outcomes between a new trifocal and an extended depth of focus intraocular lens.
    Ruiz-Mesa R; Abengózar-Vela A; Ruiz-Santos M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 28(2):182-187. PubMed ID: 28885672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fellow-eye comparison of 2 aspheric microincision intraocular lenses and effect of asphericity on visual performance.
    Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Gala KB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 22342007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Higher-order aberrations associated with better near visual acuity in eyes with aspheric monofocal IOLs.
    Song IS; Kim MJ; Yoon SY; Kim JY; Tchah H
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 30(7):442-6. PubMed ID: 24983829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pilot study of new focus-shift accommodating intraocular lens.
    Cleary G; Spalton DJ; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 20457367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of Accommodative Performance of a New Accommodative Intraocular Lens.
    Alió JL; Simonov AN; Romero D; Angelov A; Angelov Y; van Lawick W; Rombach MC
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Feb; 34(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 29425385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static and Dynamic Factors Associated With Extended Depth of Focus in Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.
    Rocha KM; Gouvea L; Waring GO; Haddad J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 216():271-282. PubMed ID: 32335058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.