These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24427852)

  • 1. What has Science's open-access sting taught us about the quality of peer review?
    Tatalović M
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 13(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 24427852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Next steps in the Schön affair.
    Kennedy D
    Science; 2002 Oct; 298(5593):495. PubMed ID: 12386303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective.
    Südhof TC
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The finer points of writing and refereeing scientific articles.
    Bain BJ; Littlewood TJ; Szydlo RM
    Br J Haematol; 2016 Feb; 172(3):350-9. PubMed ID: 26754408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commentary: monitoring biological data.
    Kritchevsky D
    Account Res; 1990 Oct; 1(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 15991407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It's difficult to publish contradictory findings.
    DeCoursey TE
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
    Gordon SE
    J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caging the pack.
    Nelson B
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jun; 124(6):371-2. PubMed ID: 27294405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standards for papers on cloning.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud: just say no!
    Blaustein JD
    Endocrinology; 2010 Jan; 151(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20028876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaking up science.
    Couzin-Frankel J
    Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statement of purpose revisited.
    Organ CH
    Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):989. PubMed ID: 11529818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What Is the Price of Science?
    Alwine JC; Enquist LW; Dermody TS; Goodrum F
    mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33653889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ten simple rules for avoiding predatory publishing scams.
    Leonard M; Stapleton S; Collins P; Selfe TK; Cataldo T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Sep; 17(9):e1009377. PubMed ID: 34555017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.