These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24428292)
1. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Del Grande F; Santini F; Herzka DA; Aro MR; Dean CW; Gold GE; Carrino JA Radiographics; 2014; 34(1):217-33. PubMed ID: 24428292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fat suppression with short inversion time inversion-recovery and chemical-shift selective saturation: a dual STIR-CHESS combination prepulse for turbo spin echo pulse sequences. Tanabe K; Nishikawa K; Sano T; Sakai O; Jara H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1277-81. PubMed ID: 20432368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques. Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of fat suppression capability for chest MR imaging with Dixon, SPAIR and STIR techniques at 3 Tesla MR system. Kishida Y; Koyama H; Seki S; Yoshikawa T; Kyotani K; Okuaki T; Sugimura K; Ohno Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47():89-96. PubMed ID: 29180099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system, evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Palosaari K; Tervonen O MAGMA; 2002 Nov; 15(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 12413559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal Fat Suppression in Head and Neck MRI: Comparison of Multipoint Dixon with 2 Different Fat-Suppression Techniques, Spectral Presaturation and Inversion Recovery, and STIR. Gaddikeri S; Mossa-Basha M; Andre JB; Hippe DS; Anzai Y AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Feb; 39(2):362-368. PubMed ID: 29242364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of chemical shift and Dixon based techniques in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Pezeshk P; Alian A; Chhabra A Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():93-100. PubMed ID: 28655433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fat suppression at 2D MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique and STIR sequence. Kirchgesner T; Perlepe V; Michoux N; Larbi A; Vande Berg B Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():40-46. PubMed ID: 28267547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. Bley TA; Wieben O; François CJ; Brittain JH; Reeder SB J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 20027567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is fat suppression in T1 and T2 FSE with mDixon superior to the frequency selection-based SPAIR technique in musculoskeletal tumor imaging? Huijgen WHF; van Rijswijk CSP; Bloem JL Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1905-1914. PubMed ID: 31154494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience. Brandão S; Nogueira L; Matos E; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I Radiol Med; 2015 Aug; 120(8):705-13. PubMed ID: 25665796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression. Le Y; Kroeker R; Kipfer HD; Lin C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Aug; 36(2):483-91. PubMed ID: 22544731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved fat water separation with water selective inversion pulse for inversion recovery imaging in cardiac MRI. Havla L; Basha T; Rayatzadeh H; Shaw JL; Manning WJ; Reeder SB; Kozerke S; Nezafat R J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Feb; 37(2):484-90. PubMed ID: 22927327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fast three-point dixon MR imaging using low-resolution images for phase correction: a comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression for pediatric musculoskeletal imaging. Rybicki FJ; Chung T; Reid J; Jaramillo D; Mulkern RV; Ma J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1019-23. PubMed ID: 11641161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR Imaging with Metal-suppression Sequences for Evaluation of Total Joint Arthroplasty. Talbot BS; Weinberg EP Radiographics; 2016; 36(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 26587889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. UTE imaging with simultaneous water and fat signal suppression using a time-efficient multispoke inversion recovery pulse sequence. Carl M; Bydder GM; Du J Magn Reson Med; 2016 Aug; 76(2):577-82. PubMed ID: 26309221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons. Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fat suppression at three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique. Kirchgesner T; Perlepe V; Michoux N; Larbi A; Vande Berg B Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Jan; 99(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 29054404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast DWI at 3 T: influence of the fat-suppression technique on image quality and diagnostic performance. Nogueira L; Brandão S; Nunes RG; Ferreira HA; Loureiro J; Ramos I Clin Radiol; 2015 Mar; 70(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 25555315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of fat-suppression techniques for hip arthroplasty MR imaging. Molière S; Dillenseger JP; Ehlinger M; Kremer S; Bierry G Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Sep; 46(9):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 28540521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]