These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24428328)

  • 1. Multidepth pumping tests in deep aquifers.
    Alam N; Olsthoorn TN
    Ground Water; 2014 Sep; 52 Suppl 1():148-60. PubMed ID: 24428328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interpreting a pumping test influenced by another well in an anisotropic aquifer.
    Weber S; Chapuis RP; Duhaime F
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 24116830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flow to a well in a five-layer system with application to the Oxnard Basin.
    Li Y; Neuman SP
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):672-82. PubMed ID: 17973745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of small-scale low and high permeability layers using single well forced-gradient tracer tests: fluorescent dye imaging and modelling at the laboratory-scale.
    Barns GL; Thornton SF; Wilson RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():84-99. PubMed ID: 25478669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leaky Aquifer Models to Simulate the Well Flow in Fractured Aquifers with Linear Interporosity Flow.
    Székely F; Szűcs P; Zákányi B
    Ground Water; 2019 Sep; 57(5):687-692. PubMed ID: 30614520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-Screened Vertical Circulation Wells for Groundwater Lowering in Unconfined Aquifers.
    Jin Y; Holzbecher E; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25801278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The unusual and large drawdown response of buried-valley aquifers to pumping.
    van der Kamp G; Maathuis H
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21671937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic analysis of pumping tests using derivative of dlgs/dlgt with case study.
    Xiao L; Xu Y
    Ground Water; 2014 Sep; 52 Suppl 1():208-17. PubMed ID: 24597544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of pumping induced flow in observation wells during aquifer testing.
    Székely F
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 23198759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating hydraulic properties using a moving-model approach and multiple aquifer tests.
    Halford KJ; Yobbi D
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 16556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting drawdowns masked by environmental stresses with water-level models.
    Garcia CA; Halford KJ; Fenelon JM
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):322-32. PubMed ID: 23469925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation of the effects of seasonally varying pumping on intraborehole flow and the vulnerability of public-supply wells to contamination.
    Yager RM; Heywood CE
    Ground Water; 2014 Sep; 52 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):40-52. PubMed ID: 24410487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Filtration and transport of Bacillus subtilis spores and the F-RNA phage MS2 in a coarse alluvial gravel aquifer: implications in the estimation of setback distances.
    Pang L; Close M; Goltz M; Noonan M; Sinton L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Apr; 77(3):165-94. PubMed ID: 15763354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite layer method for flow in layered radial two-zone aquifer systems.
    Wang X; Xu J; Cai Z
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 21883187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Groundwater modeling of Saq Aquifer Buraydah Al Qassim for better water management strategies.
    Al-Salamah IS; Ghazaw YM; Ghumman AR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Feb; 173(1-4):851-60. PubMed ID: 20364311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Novel Semi-Analytical Solution of Over-Damped Slug Test in a Three-Layered Aquifer System.
    Cao M; Wen Z; Chen G; Hu C; Zhu Q; Jakada H
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):417-426. PubMed ID: 37646611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterization of a multilayer aquifer using open well dilution tests.
    West LJ; Odling NE
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 17257341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of transmissivity estimates from single-well pumping aquifer tests.
    Halford KJ; Weight WD; Schreiber RP
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(3):467-71. PubMed ID: 16681526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating hydraulic parameters when poroelastic effects are significant.
    Berg SJ; Hsieh PA; Illman WA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(6):815-29. PubMed ID: 21204832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytical solutions of travel time to a pumping well with variable evapotranspiration.
    Chen TF; Wang XS; Wan L; Li H
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):466-73. PubMed ID: 23710800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.