192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24428925)
1. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.
Karaman S; Arici S; Dogru S; Karaman T; Tapar H; Kaya Z; Suren M; Gurler Balta M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2014 Jan; 12():8. PubMed ID: 24428925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Kim D; Seo D; Son JS; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2018 Dec; 71(6):467-475. PubMed ID: 29684992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.
Tanaka Y; Wakita T; Fukuhara S; Nishiwada M; Inoue S; Kawaguchi M; Furuya H
J Anesth; 2011 Aug; 25(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 21626452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 8-item Short-Form Health Survey and the physical comfort composite score of the quality of recovery 40-item scale provide the most responsive assessments of pain, physical function, and mental function during the first 4 days after ambulatory knee surgery with regional anesthesia.
Bost JE; Williams BA; Bottegal MT; Dang Q; Rubio DM
Anesth Analg; 2007 Dec; 105(6):1693-700, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18042869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15).
Kara U; Şimşek F; Kamburoğlu H; Özhan MÖ; Alakuş Ü; İnce ME; Eksert S; Özkan G; Eşkin MB; Şenkal S
Turk J Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 52(2):427-435. PubMed ID: 36161615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire.
Aslanlar E; Aslanlar DA; Doğanay C; Önal Ö; Sargin M; Çiçekci F; Kara F; Kara İ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Apr; 103(16):e37867. PubMed ID: 38640327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.
Bu XS; Zhang J; Zuo YX
Patient; 2016 Jun; 9(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 26518201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire.
Lee JH; Ki M; Choi S; Woo CJ; Kim D; Lim H; Kim DC
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2021 Apr; 74(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 33121227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quality of Postoperative Recovery Score QoR-15: A Multi-Centred Cohort Study.
Selvi O; Azizoğlu M; Temel G; Tulgar S; Chitneni A; Çınar EN; Özer Z; Gürkan Y
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2022 Dec; 50(6):443-448. PubMed ID: 36511494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.
Yoon S; Joo H; Oh YM; Lee J; Bahk JH; Lee HJ
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Oct; 125(4):614-621. PubMed ID: 32703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.
Demumieux F; Ludes PO; Diemunsch P; Bennett-Guerrero E; Lujic M; Lefebvre F; Noll E
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Jun; 124(6):761-767. PubMed ID: 32303379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Score QoR-15.
Kim D; Kim JK; Yeo J
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3456234. PubMed ID: 33123568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire.
Chen Y; Wang J; Liu S; Lai W; Liu J; Wang Z; Li B; Mao Y; Wang Y; Deng G; Chen J
Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2020; 16():1165-1173. PubMed ID: 33293817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION.
Miklić Bublić M; Miklić P; Barl P; Matas M; Sekulić A
Acta Clin Croat; 2021 Jun; 60(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34744273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.
Myles PS; Hunt JO; Nightingale CE; Fletcher H; Beh T; Tanil D; Nagy A; Rubinstein A; Ponsford JL
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jan; 88(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 9895071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of Arabic version of the postoperative quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.
Terkawi AS; Myles PS; Riad W; Nassar SN; Mahmoud M; AlKahtani GJ; Sala FJ; Abdulrahman A; Doais KS; Terkawi RS; Tsang S
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017 May; 11(Suppl 1):S40-S52. PubMed ID: 28616003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Postoperative Recovery Index of patients undergoing surgical intervention.
Cengiz H; Aygin D
Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 49(2):566-573. PubMed ID: 30893985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
