549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429514)
1. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses.
Lee JM; Lee HS; Hyun JJ; Lee JM; Yoo IK; Kim SH; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Seo YS; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Um SH; Kim CD
Gut Liver; 2018 May; 12(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29409303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Larghi A; Iglesias-Garcia J; Poley JW; Monges G; Petrone MC; Rindi G; Abdulkader I; Arcidiacono PG; Costamagna G; Biermann K; Bories E; Doglioni C; Dominguez-Muñoz JE; Hassan C; Bruno M; Giovannini M
Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3733-8. PubMed ID: 23644834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Performance of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy after the First Inconclusive Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions.
Cho JH; Kim J; Lee HS; Ryu SJ; Jang SI; Kim EJ; Kang H; Lee SS; Song TJ; Bang S
Gut Liver; 2024 Jan; 18(1):184-191. PubMed ID: 37317559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The slow-pull capillary technique increases the quality of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy samples in solid pancreatic lesions.
El Haddad R; Barret M; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Terris B; Coriat R; Chaussade S; Prat F
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 28(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 27140228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
