These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429514)

  • 1. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
    Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
    Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
    Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
    Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses.
    Lee JM; Lee HS; Hyun JJ; Lee JM; Yoo IK; Kim SH; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Seo YS; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Um SH; Kim CD
    Gut Liver; 2018 May; 12(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29409303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High and low negative pressure suction techniques in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 25-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Kudo T; Kawakami H; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Inoue H; Katanuma A; Kawakubo K; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Yamada R; Maguchi H; Isayama H; Mitsuhashi T; Sakamoto N;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1030-7.e1. PubMed ID: 24890422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
    Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Larghi A; Iglesias-Garcia J; Poley JW; Monges G; Petrone MC; Rindi G; Abdulkader I; Arcidiacono PG; Costamagna G; Biermann K; Bories E; Doglioni C; Dominguez-Muñoz JE; Hassan C; Bruno M; Giovannini M
    Surg Endosc; 2013 Oct; 27(10):3733-8. PubMed ID: 23644834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device.
    van Riet PA; Larghi A; Attili F; Rindi G; Nguyen NQ; Ruszkiewicz A; Kitano M; Chikugo T; Aslanian H; Farrell J; Robert M; Adeniran A; Van Der Merwe S; Roskams T; Chang K; Lin F; Lee JG; Arcidiacono PG; Petrone M; Doglioni C; Iglesias-Garcia J; Abdulkader I; Giovannini M; Bories E; Poizat F; Santo E; Scapa E; Marmor S; Bucobo JC; Buscaglia JM; Heimann A; Wu M; Baldaque-Silva F; Moro CF; Erler NS; Biermann K; Poley JW; Cahen DL; Bruno MJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Feb; 89(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 30367877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Iwashita T; Nakai Y; Samarasena JB; Park DH; Zhang Z; Gu M; Lee JG; Chang KJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):909-15. PubMed ID: 23433596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.
    Minaga K; Yoshikawa T; Yamashita Y; Akamatsu H; Ikenouchi M; Ishii T; Matsumoto H; Iwagami H; Nakatani Y; Hatamaru K; Takenaka M; Akamatsu T; Uenoyama Y; Watanabe T; Ono K; Chiba Y; Kudo M
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2982-2991. PubMed ID: 31011943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
    Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The slow-pull capillary technique increases the quality of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy samples in solid pancreatic lesions.
    El Haddad R; Barret M; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Terris B; Coriat R; Chaussade S; Prat F
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 28(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 27140228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized Trial Comparing the Flexible 19G and 25G Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Solid Pancreatic Mass Lesions.
    Ramesh J; Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Eltoum I; Frost A; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 25232713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P; Demir A; Khodakaram K; Nilsson O; Sadik R
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.