BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429514)

  • 21. Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
    Caymaz I; Afandiyeva N
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1596-1602. PubMed ID: 37464106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.
    Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study.
    Sato J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Fujie S; Kaneko J; Satoh T; Matsubayashi H; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30676114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial.
    Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
    Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort.
    Ge PS; Wani S; Watson RR; Sedarat A; Kim S; Marshall C; Wilson RH; Makker J; Mohamadnejad M; Komanduri S; Muthusamy VR
    Pancreas; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 29401169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions.
    Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial.
    Crinò SF; Conti Bellocchi MC; Di Mitri R; Inzani F; Rimbaș M; Lisotti A; Manfredi G; Teoh AYB; Mangiavillano B; Sendino O; Bernardoni L; Manfrin E; Scimeca D; Unti E; Carlino A; Voiosu T; Mateescu RB; Fusaroli P; Lega S; Buscarini E; Pergola L; Chan SM; Lamonaca L; Ginès À; Fernández-Esparrach G; Facciorusso A; Larghi A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Mar; 55(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 35915956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017.
    Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM
    Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Abdallah MA; Ahmed K; Taha W; Musa A; Reardon EE; Abdalla AO; Trikudanathan G
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jun; 67(6):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 34086166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China.
    Chen D; Ren Y; Chen S; Jin Y; Xie H; Yu L; Peng K; Xia Y; Pan D; Lu J; Lu L; Wan X; Hu D; Li B
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Apr; 57(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 35389928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
    Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study.
    Kandel P; Tranesh G; Nassar A; Bingham R; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Gomez V; Wallace MB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Dec; 84(6):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 27018087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.