These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429514)
21. Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy. Caymaz I; Afandiyeva N Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1596-1602. PubMed ID: 37464106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy. Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Nayar MK; Paranandi B; Dawwas MF; Leeds JS; Darne A; Haugk B; Majumdar D; Ahmed MM; Oppong KW Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 May; 85(5):1017-1024. PubMed ID: 27633157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Benefit of high negative pressure during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with standard 22-gauge needles for pancreatic lesions: a retrospective comparative study. Sato J; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Fujie S; Kaneko J; Satoh T; Matsubayashi H; Kishida Y; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 30676114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial. Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms. Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Per-Pass Performance Characteristics of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Malignant Solid Pancreatic Masses in a Large Multicenter Cohort. Ge PS; Wani S; Watson RR; Sedarat A; Kim S; Marshall C; Wilson RH; Makker J; Mohamadnejad M; Komanduri S; Muthusamy VR Pancreas; 2018 Mar; 47(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 29401169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimal number of needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic lesions. Uehara H; Sueyoshi H; Takada R; Fukutake N; Katayama K; Ashida R; Ioka T; Takenaka A; Nagata S; Tomita Y Pancreatology; 2015; 15(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25979252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline - March 2017. Polkowski M; Jenssen C; Kaye P; Carrara S; Deprez P; Gines A; Fernández-Esparrach G; Eisendrath P; Aithal GP; Arcidiacono P; Barthet M; Bastos P; Fornelli A; Napoleon B; Iglesias-Garcia J; Seicean A; Larghi A; Hassan C; van Hooft JE; Dumonceau JM Endoscopy; 2017 Oct; 49(10):989-1006. PubMed ID: 28898917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Abdallah MA; Ahmed K; Taha W; Musa A; Reardon EE; Abdalla AO; Trikudanathan G Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jun; 67(6):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 34086166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial. Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Wet Suction Technique Enhances the Diagnostic Efficacy and Aspirate Quality of EUS-FNA for Solid Lesions: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China. Chen D; Ren Y; Chen S; Jin Y; Xie H; Yu L; Peng K; Xia Y; Pan D; Lu J; Lu L; Wan X; Hu D; Li B J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Apr; 57(4):417-422. PubMed ID: 35389928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial. Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]