These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429912)

  • 1. Comparison of full and half-sib reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Jones LP; Compton WA; Gardner CO
    Theor Appl Genet; 1971 Jan; 41(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 24429912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative efficiency of the genotypic value and combining ability effects on reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Viana JM; Delima RO; Mundim GB; Condé AB; Vilarinho AA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2013 Apr; 126(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23224382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of selection methods for improvement of the population hybrid.
    St Martin SK
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Aug; 72(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 24248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full-sib and reciprocal recurrent selection in relation to pearl millet improvement.
    Govil JN; Pokhriyal SC; Murty BR
    Theor Appl Genet; 1982 Mar; 62(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 24270529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection in the maize populations Cimmyt and Piranão.
    da Cunha KS; Pereira MG; Gonçalves LS; Berilli AP; de Oliveira EC; Ramos HC; do Amaral Júnior AT
    Genet Mol Res; 2012 Sep; 11(3):3398-408. PubMed ID: 23079833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations.
    Wang J
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1354-65. PubMed ID: 9423254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inbreeding and heterosis effects on quantitative traits in a White Leghorn population under long-term reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Flock DK; Ameli H; Glodek P
    Br Poult Sci; 1991 Jul; 32(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 1893259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicted and realized grain yield responses to full-sib family selection in CIMMYT maize (Zea mays L.) populations.
    Crossa J; Gardner CO
    Theor Appl Genet; 1989 Jan; 77(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 24232470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction of selection differentials in finite populations with a nested full-half sib family structure.
    Meuwissen TH
    Biometrics; 1991 Mar; 47(1):195-203. PubMed ID: 2049499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential improvements in rate of genetic gain from marker-assisted selection in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
    Meuwissen TH; Van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Jun; 75(6):1651-9. PubMed ID: 1500565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which Recurrent Selection Scheme To Improve Mixtures of Crop Species? Theoretical Expectations.
    Sampoux JP; Giraud H; Litrico I
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Jan; 10(1):89-107. PubMed ID: 31672848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic analysis for some plant and fruit traits, and its implication for a breeding program of hot pepper (Capsicum annuum var. annuum L.).
    Marame F; Desalegne L; Fininsa C; Sigvald R
    Hereditas; 2009 Sep; 146(4):131-40. PubMed ID: 19765093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of molecular markers in reciprocal recurrent selection of maize increases heterosis effects.
    Berilli AP; Pereira MG; Gonçalves LS; da Cunha KS; Ramos HC; Souza Filho GA; do Amaral Júnior AT
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Oct; 10(4):2589-96. PubMed ID: 22057955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study on application of the general selection index].
    Chen YS; Sheng ZL
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 2629907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parental selection, number of breeding populations, and size of each population in inbred development.
    Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Nov; 107(7):1252-6. PubMed ID: 12928779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review.
    Bouquet A; Juga J
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):705-13. PubMed ID: 23200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.