These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429912)
21. A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Hodge GR; Volker PW; Potts BM; Owen JV Theor Appl Genet; 1996 Jan; 92(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 24166116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fitness variation and local distribution limits in an annual plant population. Emery NC; Rice KJ; Stanton ML Evolution; 2011 Apr; 65(4):1011-20. PubMed ID: 21062275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Maximization of total genetic variance in breed conservation programmes. Cervantes I; Meuwissen TH J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 22059580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genetic variation for foot-rot and Fusarium head-blight resistances among full-sib families of a self-incompatible winter rye (Secale cereale L.) population. Miedaner T; Fromme FJ; Geiger HH Theor Appl Genet; 1995 Nov; 91(6-7):862-8. PubMed ID: 24169970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of full sibs on additive breeding values under the dominance model for stature in United States Holsteins. Varona L; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Lawlor TJ J Dairy Sci; 1998 Apr; 81(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 9594402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Changes in variance components of flanking marker genotypes under varying selection intensities. Wang H; Chen YS Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2006 Apr; 33(4):312-8. PubMed ID: 16625829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer simulation of family selection schemes suitable for kale (Brassica oleracea L.), involving half-sib, full-sib and selfed families. Bradshaw JE Theor Appl Genet; 1984 Oct; 68(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 24257821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Studies on agronomic traits of seedlings from different F1 generations of Dendrobium officinale]. Liu ZG; Zhu B; Si JP; Zhang XL; Gao TT; Zhu YQ Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 38(4):498-503. PubMed ID: 23713272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Natural selection, evolvability and bias due to environmental covariance in the field in an annual plant. Winn AA J Evol Biol; 2004 Sep; 17(5):1073-83. PubMed ID: 15312079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of missing marker genotypes on the accuracy of gene-assisted breeding value estimation: a comparison of methods. Mulder HA; Meuwissen TH; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF Animal; 2010 Jan; 4(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 22443613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Selection for hybrid inviability through kin selection. Leibowitz AH J Theor Biol; 1994 Sep; 170(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 7967638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Combined S2 and crossbred family selection in full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection. Moreno-González J; Hallauer AR Theor Appl Genet; 1982 Dec; 61(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 24270497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Genealogical relationship among members of selection and production populations of yellow cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis [D. Don] Oerst.) in the absence of parental information. Massah N; Wang J; Russell JH; Van Niejenhuis A; El-Kassaby YA J Hered; 2010; 101(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 19945992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Selection bias in quantitative trait loci mapping. Lee C J Hered; 2005; 96(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15843634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]