These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429912)

  • 41. Estimates for genetic variance components in reciprocal recurrent selection in populations derived from maize single-cross hybrids.
    dos Reis MC; Pádua JM; Abreu GB; Guedes FL; Balbi RV; de Souza JC
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():540152. PubMed ID: 25009831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Combined S2 and crossbred family selection in full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Moreno-González J; Hallauer AR
    Theor Appl Genet; 1982 Dec; 61(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 24270497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genetic architecture of a heterotic cross between two populations of maize.
    Khehra AS; Singh H; Dhillon BS
    Theor Appl Genet; 1985 May; 69(3):259-61. PubMed ID: 24253818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of two methods of reciprocal recurrent selection in maize (Zea mays L.).
    Ordas B; Butron A; Alvarez A; Revilla P; Malvar RA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2012 May; 124(7):1183-91. PubMed ID: 22215249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Relative efficiency of the genotypic value and combining ability effects on reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Viana JM; Delima RO; Mundim GB; Condé AB; Vilarinho AA
    Theor Appl Genet; 2013 Apr; 126(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23224382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of selection methods for improvement of the population hybrid.
    St Martin SK
    Theor Appl Genet; 1986 Aug; 72(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 24248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
    Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Integrating genomic selection into dairy cattle breeding programmes: a review.
    Bouquet A; Juga J
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):705-13. PubMed ID: 23200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of full and half-sib reciprocal recurrent selection.
    Jones LP; Compton WA; Gardner CO
    Theor Appl Genet; 1971 Jan; 41(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 24429912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 3.