These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24429929)

  • 1. Improving, and auditing, access to clinical trial results.
    Goldacre B; Heneghan C
    BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g213. PubMed ID: 24429929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing systems for cost-effective auditing of clinical trials.
    Califf RM; Karnash SL; Woodlief LH
    Control Clin Trials; 1997 Dec; 18(6):651-60; discussion 661-6. PubMed ID: 9408727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing data quality and the variability of source data verification auditing methods in clinical research settings.
    Houston L; Probst Y; Martin A
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():25-32. PubMed ID: 29783038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of information technology for auditing effective use of laboratory services.
    Peters M; Broughton PM; Nightingale PG
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Jul; 44(7):539-42. PubMed ID: 1856284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditing clinical research data: objectives, applications and results.
    Justice RL
    Drug Inf J; 1983; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 10262249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The CRABEL score--a method for auditing medical records.
    Crawford JR; Beresford TP; Lafferty KL
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2001 Jan; 83(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11212456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry.
    Donahue JJ
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1985 Oct; 69(10):1195-7. PubMed ID: 4042098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Independent controls of quality in therapeutic trials. Apropos of an experience of 11 external audits of clinical investigators performed in 2 European multicenter trials].
    Bergmann JF; Lagier G; Calvo F; Chazelle F; Caulin C
    Therapie; 1988; 43(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 3067418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Site visit monitoring program of the clinical cooperative groups: results of the first 3 years.
    Mauer JK; Hoth DF; Macfarlane DK; Hammershaimb LD; Wittes RE
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1985 Oct; 69(10):1177-87. PubMed ID: 4042096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audits of clinical trials in India: a step in the right direction.
    Roychowdhury V
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 17152136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditing device clinical studies for US requirements.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2007 Oct; 18(6):24-7. PubMed ID: 18078178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improving the infrastructure for clinical trials in Japan].
    Nakano S
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1999 Jan; 26(2 Suppl):225-30. PubMed ID: 9987523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What to do about poor clinical performance in clinical trials.
    Mason S; Nicholl J; Lilford R
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7334):419-20. PubMed ID: 11850378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance in a cooperative group.
    Wolter JM
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1985 Oct; 69(10):1189-93. PubMed ID: 4042097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditing cataract surgery nationwide.
    Wong D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 90(7):817. PubMed ID: 16782948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The CRABEL score--setting standards in maxillofacial medical note-keeping.
    Dhariwal DK; Gibbons AJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Jun; 42(3):200-2. PubMed ID: 15121263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical audit, the case for ethical scrutiny?
    Rix G; Cutting K
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 1996; 9(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 10162125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A computerised leg ulcer database with facilities for reporting and auditing.
    Taylor RJ; Taylor AD; Marcuson RW
    J Wound Care; 1999 Jan; 8(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 10214197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prototype of running clinical trials in an untrustworthy environment using blockchain.
    Wong DR; Bhattacharya S; Butte AJ
    Nat Commun; 2019 Feb; 10(1):917. PubMed ID: 30796226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the increase in osteoporosis prevention a result of the audit?
    Naunton M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2006 Oct; 108(7):718-9. PubMed ID: 16621242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.