These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24430591)

  • 1. World of wordcraft: on scientific editing.
    Martin A
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Feb; 38(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 24430591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [When the editor makes an error].
    Hem E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Oct; 128(20):2303. PubMed ID: 19096482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A vision for the European journal of clinical investigation: note from the new editors.
    Ioannidis JP; Tatsioni A; Karassa FB
    Eur J Clin Invest; 2010 Jan; 40(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20055893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Letter to the editor: reviewers.
    Senayli A; Senayli Y
    Account Res; 2012; 19(4):267-8. PubMed ID: 22861182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open access, scientific integrity and Andrology.
    Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
    Andrology; 2013 Mar; 1(2):175-6. PubMed ID: 23408751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Magazine or journal--what is the difference? The role of the monitoring editor.
    Bretscher A
    Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Apr; 24(7):887-9. PubMed ID: 23533210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].
    Thörn A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Oct; 101(44):3458. PubMed ID: 15560663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
    Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
    Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for reviewers of the Spanish Journal of Gastroenterology (REED).
    Cienfuegos JA; Pérez-Cuadrado Martínez E
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2018 Jun; 110(6):342-343. PubMed ID: 29781283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Editors and authors: two halves of a whole.
    Borus JF
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 38(2):224-5. PubMed ID: 24477900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The hidden work of a journal editor.
    Kearney MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2018 Feb; 41(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 29360181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflicts of interest for medical publishers and editors: protecting the integrity of scientific scholarship.
    Desai SS; Shortell CK
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Sep; 54(3 Suppl):59S-63S. PubMed ID: 21872119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiology 2016: The Care and Scientific Rigor Used to Process and Evaluate Original Research Manuscripts for Publication.
    Levine D; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 2016 Jan; 278(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 26690988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
    Elmore SA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A thank you note from the editor-in-chief.
    Farrell GC
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):10. PubMed ID: 22188026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.