These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24431443)

  • 1. The neural dynamics of face detection in the wild revealed by MVPA.
    Cauchoix M; Barragan-Jason G; Serre T; Barbeau EJ
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(3):846-54. PubMed ID: 24431443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is the N170 peak of visual event-related brain potentials car-selective?
    Dering B; Martin CD; Thierry G
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):902-6. PubMed ID: 19474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception.
    Moulson MC; Balas B; Nelson C; Sinha P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Dec; 49(14):3847-53. PubMed ID: 22001852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.
    Rousselet GA; Pernet CR; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combining features from ERP components in single-trial EEG for discriminating four-category visual objects.
    Wang C; Xiong S; Hu X; Yao L; Zhang J
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Oct; 9(5):056013. PubMed ID: 22983495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active visual search in non-stationary scenes: coping with temporal variability and uncertainty.
    Ušćumlić M; Blankertz B
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016015. PubMed ID: 26726921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.
    Deiber MP; Rodriguez C; Jaques D; Missonnier P; Emch J; Millet P; Gold G; Giannakopoulos P; Ibañez V
    Neuroscience; 2010 Nov; 171(1):173-86. PubMed ID: 20801196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts?
    Macé MJ; Thorpe SJ; Fabre-Thorpe M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 21(7):2007-18. PubMed ID: 15869494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object detection in natural scenes.
    Groen IIA; Jahfari S; Seijdel N; Ghebreab S; Lamme VAF; Scholte HS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1006690. PubMed ID: 30596644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: an ERP analysis.
    Flevaris AV; Robertson LC; Bentin S
    Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1194():100-9. PubMed ID: 18190897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Face repetition effects in direct and indirect tasks: an event-related brain potentials study.
    Trenner MU; Schweinberger SR; Jentzsch I; Sommer W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov; 21(3):388-400. PubMed ID: 15511654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face-specificity is robust across diverse stimuli and individual people, even when interstimulus variance is zero.
    Schendan HE; Ganis G
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 23350993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face familiarity decisions take 200 msec in the human brain: electrophysiological evidence from a go/no-go speeded task.
    Caharel S; Ramon M; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 26(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 23915049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different processes are involved in human brain for shape and face comparisons.
    Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang H; Cui L; Tian S; Wang D
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 May; 303(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 11323109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity.
    Thierry G; Martin CD; Downing P; Pegna AJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 10(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 17334361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked and unmasked electrophysiological repetition effects of famous faces.
    Martens U; Schweinberger SR; Kiefer M; Burton AM
    Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 16872582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automaticity in attractive face processing: brain potentials from a dual task.
    Rellecke J; Bakirtas AM; Sommer W; Schacht A
    Neuroreport; 2011 Oct; 22(14):706-10. PubMed ID: 21849915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
    Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's neural response to contrast-negated faces is species specific.
    Balas B; Stevenson K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Mar; 119():73-86. PubMed ID: 24309247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.