These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24431719)
1. Age changes in horizontal condylar angle: a clinical and cephalometric study. Sreelal T; Janardanan K; Nair AS; Nair AS J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Jun; 13(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 24431719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of condylar inclination of dentulous subjects determined by axiograph and to compare with manual programming of articulators using protrusive interocclusal record. Prasad KD; Shetty M; Chandy BK Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 26321837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients. Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study. Galagali G; Kalekhan SM; Nidawani P; Naik J; Behera S J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 27141164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals. Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An Keerthana SR; Mohammed HS; Hariprasad A; Anand M; Ayesha S J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinico-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Prasad KD; Shah N; Hegde C Contemp Clin Dent; 2012 Oct; 3(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 23633793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study. Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A newer technique to program a semi adjustable articulator. Venkateshwaran R; Karthigeyan S; Manoharan PS; Konchada J; Ramaswamy M; Bhuminathan J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2014 Jul; 6(Suppl 1):S135-9. PubMed ID: 25210356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standard and limit values for the symmetry of articulation parameters in the temporomandibular joint area - evaluations of the associated project of the SHIP study. Kordaß B; Bernhardt O; Ruge S; Ratzmann A; Hugger S; Hugger A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 31840143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A study on the accuracy of horizontal condylar guidance values in edentulous patients using preprosthetic diagnostic radiographs. Paul R; Das S; Bhattacharyya J; Ghosh S; Goel P; Dutta K J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 30111916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study. Goyal MK; Goyal S Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods. Shreshta P; Jain V; Bhalla A; Pruthi G J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 4(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 22977723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of condylar inclination settings in two types of semiadjustable articulators. Zabarović D; Vojvodić D; Katanec D; Jerolimov V; Carek V; Vusić J Coll Antropol; 2009 Jun; 33(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 19662760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study. dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of static and functional methods for recording centric relation and condylar guidance: a clinical study. Thakur M; Jain V; Parkash H; Kumar P J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2012 Sep; 12(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 23997468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Determined by Panoramic Radiographs to the One Determined by Conventional Methods Using Lateral Interocclusal Records in the Saudi Arabian Population. Dewan H; Akkam TI; Chohan H; Sherwani A; Masha F; Dhae M J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 32039080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Role of Maxillofacial Structure on Condylar Displacement in Maximum Intercuspation and Centric Relation. Radej I; Szarmach I Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1439203. PubMed ID: 35097107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of the Intraoral Records for programming the Condylar Inclination of the Semiadjustable Articulator. Diego SM; Juan DVL J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):624-629. PubMed ID: 34393118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of interocclusal records on the condylar path of the articulator]. Angyal J; Bukovinszki K; Keszthelyi G Fogorv Sz; 2002 Apr; 95(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 11980427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]