These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24431838)

  • 1. Achieving the prediction results by visualized treatment objective following anterior maxillary segmental osteotomy. A retrospective study.
    Venkatesh V; Kumar KA; Mohan AP; Kumar BP; Kunusoth R; Kumar MP
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Jun; 12(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 24431838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction accuracy of computer-assisted surgical visual treatment objectives as compared with conventional visual treatment objectives.
    Gossett CB; Preston CB; Dunford R; Lampasso J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 15883933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of video imaging prediction in combined maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Upton PM; Sadowsky PL; Sarver DM; Heaven TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 9423698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular setback osteotomy: facial soft tissue behavior and possibility to improve the accuracy of the soft tissue profile prediction with the use of a computerized cephalometric program: Quick Ceph Image Pro: v. 2.5.
    Chunmaneechote P; Friede H
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 May; 2(2):85-98. PubMed ID: 10534984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.
    Loh S; Yow M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 12593006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
    Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of two VTO methods.
    Sample LB; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9770097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of an imaging software and manual prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.
    Ahmad Akhoundi MS; Shirani G; Arshad M; Heidar H; Sodagar A
    J Dent (Tehran); 2012; 9(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 23119126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of a LeFort I maxillary osteotomy.
    Semaan S; Goonewardene MS
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):964-73. PubMed ID: 16448239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of computer-aided prediction in soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Zhang X; Mei L; Yan X; Wei J; Li Y; Li H; Li Z; Zheng W; Li Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 31784016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The predictability of maxillary repositioning in LeFort I orthognathic surgery.
    Jacobson R; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Aug; 122(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 12165768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability of computerized cephalometric soft tissue prediction following bimaxillary anterior subapical osteotomy.
    Lew KK
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 1431433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of a manual soft tissue profile prediction method following mandibular setback osteotomy.
    Kolokitha OE
    Eur J Dent; 2007 Oct; 1(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 19212468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of computerized cephalometric outcome predictions of mandibular set-back surgery.
    Stefanović N; Glisić B; Sćepan I
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2011; 139(3-4):138-42. PubMed ID: 21618862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing.
    Cangialosi TJ; Chung JM; Elliott DF; Meistrell ME
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 7486242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasal Profile Changes Following Anterior Maxillary Segmental Osteotomy: A Lateral Cephalometric Study.
    Komal R; Deepak PK; Muralee CM; Ravi MS
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Jun; 15(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 27298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of a computer-based orthognathic surgery prediction system to postsurgical results.
    Gerbo LR; Poulton DR; Covell DA; Russell CA
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9456618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of treatment outcome in cleft maxillary hypoplasia treated by rigid external distractor: a cephalometric study.
    Sahoo N; Desai AP; Jayan B; Gupta V
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 24406568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.