190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24431912)
1. A randomized controlled trial of comparison on time and rate of cecal and termianl Ileal intubation according to adult-colonoscope length: intermediate versus long.
Kim KM; Lee SH; Lee DJ; Kim KN; Seo SW; Lee HS; Lee DR
J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Jan; 29(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 24431912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison on colonoscopic parameters according to length of adult-colonoscope.
Lee SH; Lee DJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 24384429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope.
Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency.
Barthel J; Hinojosa T; Shah N
J Clin Gastroenterol; 1995 Jul; 21(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 7560830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of bending section length on insertion and retroflexion properties of pediatric and adult colonoscopes.
Kessler WR; Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jun; 100(6):1290-5. PubMed ID: 15929759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does the variable-stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of the variable stiffness colonoscope compared with the standard adult colonoscope.
Xie Q; Chen B; Liu L; Gan H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 12():151. PubMed ID: 23095461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of a responsive insertion technology (RIT) colonoscope versus a variable-stiffness colonoscope.
Prieto-de-Frías C; Muñoz-Navas M; Carretero C; Carrascosa J; Betés MT; de-la-Riva S; Herraiz MT; Súbtil JC
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2013 Apr; 105(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 23859449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benefit of "transparent soft-short-hood on the scope" for colonoscopy among experienced gastroenterologists and gastroenterologist trainee: a randomized, controlled trial.
Prachayakul V; Aswakul P; Limsrivilai J; Anuchapreeda S; Bhanthumkomol P; Sripongpun P; Prangboonyarat T; Kachintorn U
Surg Endosc; 2012 Apr; 26(4):1041-6. PubMed ID: 22042588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial.
East JM
BMC Res Notes; 2013 Feb; 6():48. PubMed ID: 23379922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of water filling on terminal ileum intubation with a distal-tip mucosal exposure device.
Vemulapalli KC; Tippins N; Lahr RE; Sullivan AW; Love E; McWhinney CD; Peterson MM; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Mar; 91(3):663-668. PubMed ID: 31756315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of colonoscope length in cecal insertion time.
Lee HL; Eun CS; Lee OY; Jeon YC; Han DS; Sohn JH; Yoon BC; Choi HS; Hahm JS; Lee MH; Lee DH; Moon W; Kim SY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 1):503-8. PubMed ID: 19152904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study.
Groth S; Rex DK; Rösch T; Hoepffner N
Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Jun; 106(6):1075-80. PubMed ID: 21386833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colonoscopic performance in a sedated health screening population: influence of colonoscope type.
Lei WY; Yi CH; Liu TT; Chen CL
Hepatogastroenterology; 2012; 59(114):436-9. PubMed ID: 22353512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cecal intubation time between the use of one-channel and two-channel water exchange colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.
Tseng CW; Koo M; Hsieh YH
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 35(9):1562-1569. PubMed ID: 32203986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
