These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24432790)

  • 1. Including explicit water molecules as part of the protein structure in MM/PBSA calculations.
    Zhu YL; Beroza P; Artis DR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Feb; 54(2):462-9. PubMed ID: 24432790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the scoring of protein-ligand binding affinity by including the effects of structural water and electronic polarization.
    Liu J; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 23651068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
    Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase.
    Pearlman DA
    J Med Chem; 2005 Dec; 48(24):7796-807. PubMed ID: 16302819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches.
    Srivastava HK; Sastry GN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An MM/3D-RISM approach for ligand binding affinities.
    Genheden S; Luchko T; Gusarov S; Kovalenko A; Ryde U
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Jul; 114(25):8505-16. PubMed ID: 20524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
    Genheden S; Ryde U
    Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Density functional theory calculations on entire proteins for free energies of binding: application to a model polar binding site.
    Fox SJ; Dziedzic J; Fox T; Tautermann CS; Skylaris CK
    Proteins; 2014 Dec; 82(12):3335-46. PubMed ID: 25212393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing protein kinase selectivity with molecular dynamics and mm-pbsa binding free energy calculations.
    Muzzioli E; Del Rio A; Rastelli G
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2011 Aug; 78(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21585710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explicitly solvated ligand contribution to continuum solvation models for binding free energies: selectivity of theophylline binding to an RNA aptamer.
    Freedman H; Huynh LP; Le L; Cheatham TE; Tuszynski JA; Truong TN
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 Feb; 114(6):2227-37. PubMed ID: 20099932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA.
    Rastelli G; Del Rio A; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):797-810. PubMed ID: 19569205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Explicit Ligand Hydration Shells Improve the Correlation between MM-PB/GBSA Binding Energies and Experimental Activities.
    Maffucci I; Contini A
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2013 Jun; 9(6):2706-17. PubMed ID: 26583864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
    Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
    J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Free energy simulations and MM-PBSA analyses on the affinity and specificity of steroid binding to antiestradiol antibody.
    Laitinen T; Kankare JA; Peräkylä M
    Proteins; 2004 Apr; 55(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 14997538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PBSA_E: A PBSA-Based Free Energy Estimator for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity.
    Liu X; Liu J; Zhu T; Zhang L; He X; Zhang JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 May; 56(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 27088302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the binding energies of testosterone, 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate with an antitestosterone antibody.
    Nordman N; Valjakka J; Peräkylä M
    Proteins; 2003 Jan; 50(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 12471606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid estimation of relative protein-ligand binding affinities using a high-throughput version of MM-PBSA.
    Brown SP; Muchmore SW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1493-503. PubMed ID: 17518461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
    Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In silico study directed towards identification of novel high-affinity inhibitors targeting an oncogenic protein: BRD4-BD1.
    Tumdam R; Kumar A; Subbarao N; Balaji BS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):975-996. PubMed ID: 30411639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can MM-PBSA calculations predict the specificities of protein kinase inhibitors?
    Page CS; Bates PA
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Dec; 27(16):1990-2007. PubMed ID: 17036304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.