130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24433346)
1. Effect size and cost-effectiveness estimates of breast and cervical cancer screening reminders by population size through complete enumeration of Japanese local municipalities.
Komoto S; Nishiwaki Y; Okamura T; Tanaka H; Takebayashi T
BMC Public Health; 2014 Jan; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24433346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Text messages to increase attendance to follow-up cervical cancer screening appointments among HPV-positive Tanzanian women (Connected2Care): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Linde DS; Andersen MS; Mwaiselage JD; Manongi R; Kjaer SK; Rasch V
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):555. PubMed ID: 29162148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Racial differences in cancer screening with electronic health records and electronic preventive care reminders.
Mishuris RG; Linder JA
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e264-9. PubMed ID: 24637955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of Leveraging Social Determinants of Health to Improve Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Mohan G; Chattopadhyay S
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1434-1444. PubMed ID: 32556187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.
Kaczorowski J; Hearps SJ; Lohfeld L; Goeree R; Donald F; Burgess K; Sebaldt RJ
Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jun; 59(6):e282-9. PubMed ID: 23766067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Text Message Reminders on Attendance at Cervical Cancer Screening Appointments in a Predominantly Hispanic Population.
Molokwu JC; Dwivedi A; Alomari A; Guzman J; Shokar N
Hisp Health Care Int; 2023 Sep; 21(3):121-128. PubMed ID: 35522229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does lack of resources impair access to breast and cervical cancer screening in Japan?
Sano H; Goto R; Hamashima C
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180819. PubMed ID: 28704430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of a stepwise intervention to promote adherence to cervical cancer screening.
Firmino-Machado J; Soeteman DI; Lunet N
Eur J Public Health; 2020 Jun; 30(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 31848592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.
Community Preventive Services Task Force
Am J Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 43(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 22704753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention.
Tabuchi T; Hoshino T; Nakayama T; Ito Y; Ioka A; Miyashiro I; Tsukuma H
Int J Cancer; 2013 Aug; 133(4):972-83. PubMed ID: 23400833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tailored message interventions versus typical messages for increasing participation in colorectal cancer screening among a non-adherent population: A randomized controlled trial.
Hirai K; Ishikawa Y; Fukuyoshi J; Yonekura A; Harada K; Shibuya D; Yamamoto S; Mizota Y; Hamashima C; Saito H
BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():431. PubMed ID: 27220976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast and cervical cancer screening attendance among Czech women.
Altová A; Kulhánová I; Brůha L; Lustigová M
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2021 Jun; 29(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 34245547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mobile phone messaging reminders for attendance at healthcare appointments.
Gurol-Urganci I; de Jongh T; Vodopivec-Jamsek V; Atun R; Car J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2013(12):CD007458. PubMed ID: 24310741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study of the effects of historical patient compliance and a population-based informatics prompted reminder on screening rates.
MacLaughlin KL; Swanson KM; Naessens JM; Angstman KB; Chaudhry R
J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Apr; 20(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 24237657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stepwise strategy to improve cervical cancer screening adherence (SCAN-Cervical Cancer) - Automated text messages, phone calls and reminders: Population based randomized controlled trial.
Firmino-Machado J; Varela S; Mendes R; Moreira A; Lunet N;
Prev Med; 2018 Sep; 114():123-133. PubMed ID: 29894717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using SMS reminders in psychology clinics: a cautionary tale.
Clough BA; Casey LM
Behav Cogn Psychother; 2014 May; 42(3):257-68. PubMed ID: 24495365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving cervical cancer screening attendance in Finland.
Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Malila N; Nieminen P
Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(6):E677-84. PubMed ID: 25178683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
