730 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24433684)
1. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Verdoodt F; Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Suonio E; Dillner L; Minozzi S; Bellisario C; Banzi R; Zhao FH; Hillemanns P; Anttila A
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Feb; 15(2):172-83. PubMed ID: 24433684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and effectiveness of HPV mRNA testing in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arbyn M; Simon M; de Sanjosé S; Clarke MA; Poljak M; Rezhake R; Berkhof J; Nyaga V; Gultekin M; Canfell K; Wentzensen N
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Jul; 23(7):950-960. PubMed ID: 35709810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse: a randomised, paired screen-positive, non-inferiority trial.
Polman NJ; Ebisch RMF; Heideman DAM; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM; Molijn AC; Meijer CJLM; Quint WGV; Snijders PJF; Massuger LFAG; van Kemenade FJ; Berkhof J
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 30658933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples: updated meta-analyses.
Arbyn M; Smith SB; Temin S; Sultana F; Castle P;
BMJ; 2018 Dec; 363():k4823. PubMed ID: 30518635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pooled analysis of a self-sampling HPV DNA Test as a cervical cancer primary screening method.
Zhao FH; Lewkowitz AK; Chen F; Lin MJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Ma JF; Niyazi M; Li CQ; Li SM; Smith JS; Belinson JL; Qiao YL; Castle PE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 Feb; 104(3):178-88. PubMed ID: 22271765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of a Urine-Based Human Papillomavirus Assay in a Referral Population.
Cuzick J; Cadman L; Ahmad AS; Ho L; Terry G; Kleeman M; Lyons D; Austin J; Stoler MH; Vibat CRT; Dockter J; Robbins D; Billings PR; Erlander MG
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Jul; 26(7):1053-1059. PubMed ID: 28223432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Human papillomavirus testing versus repeat cytology for triage of minor cytological cervical lesions.
Arbyn M; Roelens J; Simoens C; Buntinx F; Paraskevaidis E; Martin-Hirsch PP; Prendiville WJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; 2013(3):CD008054. PubMed ID: 23543559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HPV testing in first-void urine provides sensitivity for CIN2+ detection comparable with a smear taken by a clinician or a brush-based self-sample: cross-sectional data from a triage population.
Leeman A; Del Pino M; Molijn A; Rodriguez A; Torné A; de Koning M; Ordi J; van Kemenade F; Jenkins D; Quint W
BJOG; 2017 Aug; 124(9):1356-1363. PubMed ID: 28391609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: comparison of sensitivity, specificity, and frequency of referral.
Kulasingam SL; Hughes JP; Kiviat NB; Mao C; Weiss NS; Kuypers JM; Koutsky LA
JAMA; 2002 Oct; 288(14):1749-57. PubMed ID: 12365959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-risk HPV testing on self-sampled versus clinician-collected specimens: a review on the clinical accuracy and impact on population attendance in cervical cancer screening.
Snijders PJ; Verhoef VM; Arbyn M; Ogilvie G; Minozzi S; Banzi R; van Kemenade FJ; Heideman DA; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2013 May; 132(10):2223-36. PubMed ID: 22907569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. HPV detection in a self-collected vaginal swab combined with VIA for cervical cancer screening with correlation to histologically confirmed CIN.
Kamal EM; El Sayed GA; El Behery MM; El Shennawy GA
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1207-13. PubMed ID: 25009070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long term results of follow-up after HPV self-sampling with devices Qvintip and HerSwab in women non-attending cervical screening programme.
Bokan T; Ivanus U; Jerman T; Takac I; Arko D
Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 33764704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples compared with cytologic screening to detect cervical cancer.
Wright TC; Denny L; Kuhn L; Pollack A; Lorincz A
JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 10632284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study.
El-Zein M; Bouten S; Louvanto K; Gilbert L; Gotlieb W; Hemmings R; Behr MA; Franco EL;
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 149(3):491-497. PubMed ID: 29678360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus Testing on Self-Collected Urine and Vaginal Samples in a Referral Population.
Cho HW; Hong JH; Min KJ; Ouh YT; Seong SJ; Moon JH; Cho SH; Lee JK
Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jul; 53(3):829-836. PubMed ID: 33421987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of self-collected vaginal, vulvar and urine samples with physician-collected cervical samples for human papillomavirus testing to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Sellors JW; Lorincz AT; Mahony JB; Mielzynska I; Lytwyn A; Roth P; Howard M; Chong S; Daya D; Chapman W; Chernesky M
CMAJ; 2000 Sep; 163(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 11006761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test as the primary test in a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study.
Zorzi M; Del Mistro A; Farruggio A; de'Bartolomeis L; Frayle-Salamanca H; Baboci L; Bertazzo A; Cocco P; Fedato C; Gennaro M; Marchi N; Penon MG; Cogo C; Ferro A
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1260-7; discussion 1267-8. PubMed ID: 23786222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of standardised colposcopy to detect cervical precancer and cancer for triage of women testing positive for human papillomavirus: results from the ESTAMPA multicentric screening study.
Valls J; Baena A; Venegas G; Celis M; González M; Sosa C; Santin JL; Ortega M; Soilán A; Turcios E; Figueroa J; Rodríguez de la Peña M; Figueredo A; Beracochea AV; Pérez N; Martínez-Better J; Lora O; Jiménez JY; Giménez D; Fleider L; Salgado Y; Martínez S; Bellido-Fuentes Y; Flores B; Tatti S; Villagra V; Cruz-Valdez A; Terán C; Sánchez GI; Rodríguez G; Picconi MA; Ferrera A; Mendoza L; Calderón A; Murillo R; Wiesner C; Broutet N; Luciani S; Pérez C; Darragh TM; Jerónimo J; Herrero R; Almonte M;
Lancet Glob Health; 2023 Mar; 11(3):e350-e360. PubMed ID: 36796982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
