These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24433811)

  • 1. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review.
    Ganatra AM; Rozet F; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19201521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Oliver JL; Kim JH
    Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Sep; 18(9):66. PubMed ID: 28718162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; He Y; Zhang X; Wang Z; Zuo X; Gao L; Hong L
    Ann Transl Med; 2021 Mar; 9(6):449. PubMed ID: 33850846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical techniques for advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse.
    Brown DN; Strauchon C; Gonzalez H; Gruber D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Feb; 68(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 26448444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Sajadi KP; Goldman HB
    Nat Rev Urol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 25800401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized trial of vaginal mesh attachment techniques for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Tan-Kim J; Nager CW; Grimes CL; Luber KM; Lukacz ES; Brown HW; Ferrante KL; Dyer KY; Kirby AC; Menefee SA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 May; 26(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 25421934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for managing pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Yang SS; Chang SJ
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1037-1045. PubMed ID: 34779989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy as a technique for advanced uterine and vault prolapse.
    Onol FF; Onol SY
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 24(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 22614674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of prolapse of the apical segment of the vagina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Gouveia De Sa M; Claydon LS; Whitlow B; Dolcet Artahona MA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 26249235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
    Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.