These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

527 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24433811)

  • 21. Comparison of transvaginal mesh surgery and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Kusuda M; Kagami K; Takahashi I; Nozaki T; Sakamoto I
    BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):268. PubMed ID: 35820857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing the outcomes and effectiveness of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chang CL; Chen CH; Chang SJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 33760992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Coolen AWM; Bui BN; Dietz V; Wang R; van Montfoort APA; Mol BWJ; Roovers JWR; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1767-1783. PubMed ID: 29038834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 32148120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
    BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laparoscopic and robotic sacropexy: retrospective review of learning curve experiences and follow-up.
    Pilka R; Gágyor D; Študentová M; Neubert D; Dzvinčuk P
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28925269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Awad N; Mustafa S; Amit A; Deutsch M; Eldor-Itskovitz J; Lowenstein L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 23274792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences.
    Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors associated with intraoperative conversion during robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Linder BJ; Chow GK; Hertzig LL; Clifton M; Elliott DS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 26005974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abdominal Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Campbell P; Cloney L; Jha S
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2016 Aug; 71(7):435-42. PubMed ID: 27436178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.
    Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Smith BC; Crisp CC; Kleeman SD; Yook E; Pauls RN
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30807407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perioperative Complications and Cost of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, and Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Borah BJ; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27682746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
    Nosti PA; Umoh Andy U; Kane S; White DE; Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Gutman RE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 24368486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system.
    Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
    Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.
    Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Trabuco EC; Gebhart JB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(5):297-309. PubMed ID: 28118173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.