BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24433958)

  • 1. Predictive ability of selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Weller JI; Glick G; Shirak A; Ezra E; Seroussi E; Shemesh M; Zeron Y; Ron M
    Animal; 2014 Feb; 8(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 24433958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
    Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.
    Su G; Guldbrandtsen B; Gregersen VR; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1175-83. PubMed ID: 20172238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of genomic evaluation to dairy cattle in New Zealand.
    Winkelman AM; Johnson DL; Harris BL
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jan; 98(1):659-75. PubMed ID: 25468702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.
    Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
    Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Erbe M; Hayes BJ; Matukumalli LK; Goswami S; Bowman PJ; Reich CM; Mason BA; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jul; 95(7):4114-29. PubMed ID: 22720968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of principal component approach to predict direct genomic breeding values for beef traits in Italian Simmental cattle.
    Gaspa G; Pintus MA; Nicolazzi EL; Vicario D; Valentini A; Dimauro C; Macciotta NP
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jan; 91(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 23100576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signatures of contemporary selection in the Israeli Holstein dairy cattle.
    Glick G; Shirak A; Uliel S; Zeron Y; Ezra E; Seroussi E; Ron M; Weller JI
    Anim Genet; 2012 Jul; 43 Suppl 1():45-55. PubMed ID: 22742502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
    Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of genomic breeding values for dairy traits in Italian Brown and Simmental bulls using a principal component approach.
    Pintus MA; Gaspa G; Nicolazzi EL; Vicario D; Rossoni A; Ajmone-Marsan P; Nardone A; Dimauro C; Macciotta NP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3390-400. PubMed ID: 22612973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production.
    Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
    Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Börner V; Teuscher F; Reinsch N
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Apr; 95(4):2097-107. PubMed ID: 22459855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.