These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24434024)

  • 1. Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.
    Schotter ER; Bicknell K; Howard I; Levy R; Rayner K
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 24434024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill.
    Steen-Baker AA; Ng S; Payne BR; Anderson CJ; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EAL
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Aug; 32(5):460-472. PubMed ID: 28816473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading.
    Whitford V; Titone D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1151-65. PubMed ID: 24205888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG.
    Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word skipping: Effects of word length, predictability, spelling and reading skill.
    Slattery TJ; Yates M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jan; 71(1):250-259. PubMed ID: 28856970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proofreading in Young and Older Adults: The Effect of Error Category and Comprehension Difficulty.
    Shafto MA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Nov; 12(11):14445-60. PubMed ID: 26580634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eye movements during reading and topic scanning: effects of word frequency.
    White SJ; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 25528014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do task demands and aging affect lexical prediction during online reading of natural texts?
    Andrews S; Veldre A; Wong R; Yu L; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):407-430. PubMed ID: 36521158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical Stress and Linguistic Predictability Influence Proofreading Behavior.
    Harris LN; Perfetti CA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():96. PubMed ID: 26903904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.
    Chang M; Hao L; Zhao S; Li L; Paterson KB; Wang J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2793-2801. PubMed ID: 32406003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.
    Parker AJ; Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1614-1633. PubMed ID: 31524433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Older adults make greater use of word predictability in Chinese reading.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Xu Q; Zhang K; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):780-790. PubMed ID: 31380666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A further look at ageing and word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from one-character words.
    Zhao S; Li L; Chang M; Wang J; Paterson KB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 32749198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading.
    Schuster S; Hawelka S; Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Richlan F
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3889-3904. PubMed ID: 27365297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: differential effects of frequency and predictability.
    Ashby J; Rayner K; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1065-86. PubMed ID: 16194948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word skipping during the lexical acquisition process.
    Eskenazi MA; Kemp P; Folk JR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 33135575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers.
    Zang C; Zhang M; Bai X; Yan G; Paterson KB; Liversedge SP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1409-25. PubMed ID: 26366620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.