309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24434158)
1. Review of ultrasonography of malignant neck nodes: greyscale, Doppler, contrast enhancement and elastography.
Ying M; Bhatia KS; Lee YP; Yuen HY; Ahuja AT
Cancer Imaging; 2014 Jan; 13(4):658-69. PubMed ID: 24434158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sonography of neck lymph nodes. Part II: abnormal lymph nodes.
Ahuja A; Ying M
Clin Radiol; 2003 May; 58(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 12727163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
Desmots F; Fakhry N; Mancini J; Reyre A; Vidal V; Jacquier A; Santini L; Moulin G; Varoquaux A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 26617244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes.
Ahuja AT; Ying M; Ho SY; Antonio G; Lee YP; King AD; Wong KT
Cancer Imaging; 2008 Mar; 8(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 18390388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Introduction to ultrasonography of lymph nodes of the neck].
Thomsen JB; Sørensen JA; Jakobsen J; Karstoft J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Feb; 171(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 19208332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Real-time ultrasound elastography: an assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes.
Lo WC; Cheng PW; Wang CT; Liao LJ
Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2351-7. PubMed ID: 23652848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The place of CEUS in distinguishing benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes: a prospective study.
Poanta L; Serban O; Pascu I; Pop S; Cosgarea M; Fodor D
Med Ultrason; 2014 Mar; 16(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24567918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of metastases and reactive lymph nodes in Doppler sonography using an ultrasound contrast enhancer.
Mäurer J; Willam C; Schroeder R; Hidajad N; Hell B; Bier J; Weber S; Felix R
Invest Radiol; 1997 Aug; 32(8):441-6. PubMed ID: 9258731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of Shear Wave Elastography Versus Contrast-Enhanced Sonography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Superficial Lymphadenopathy Unexplained by Conventional Sonography.
Tan S; Miao LY; Cui LG; Sun PF; Qian LX
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jan; 36(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 27925679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy: is power Doppler sonography routinely indicated?
Ahuja A; Ying M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 29(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 12706185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sonographic evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes].
Zhao RN; Zhang B; Jiang YX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2012 Dec; 34(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 23286414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical application of real-time tissue elastography to head and neck cancer--evaluation of cervical lymph node metastasis with real-time tissue elastography].
Furukawa MK; Kubota A; Hanamura H; Furukawa M
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2007 Jul; 110(7):503-5. PubMed ID: 17695297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Is there a need for new imaging methods for lymph node evaluation?].
Dietrich CF; Ponnudurai R; Bachmann Nielsen M
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 23079737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers?
Dudau C; Hameed S; Gibson D; Muthu S; Sandison A; Eckersley RJ; Clarke P; Cosgrove DO; Lim AK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):747-54. PubMed ID: 24462154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual touch tissue imaging quantification shear wave elastography for determining benign versus malignant cervical lymph nodes: a comparison with conventional ultrasound.
Kılıç A; Çolakoğlu Er H
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Mar; 25(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 30774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for reactive and malignant/metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
Fujiwara T; Tomokuni J; Iwanaga K; Ooba S; Haji T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1178-83. PubMed ID: 23562011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modern imaging lymph node staging of the head and neck region.
Krestan C; Herneth AM; Formanek M; Czerny C
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 16687230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic role of ultrasound elastography on lymph node metastases in patients with head and neck cancer.
Pehlivan M; Gurbuz MK; Cingi C; Adapinar B; Değirmenci AN; Acikalin FM; Pinarbaşli MÖ; Colak E
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 29933905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound sonography combined with strain elastography to evaluate mandibular lymph nodes in clinically healthy dogs and those with head and neck tumors.
Choi M; Yoon J; Choi M
Vet J; 2020 Mar; 257():105447. PubMed ID: 32546353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.
Seicean A; Mosteanu O; Seicean R
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jan; 23(1):25-41. PubMed ID: 28104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
