These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24435626)

  • 1. Genotype - hatch interactions as a source of bias in estimating genetic components of variance for eight-week weight in poultry.
    Enfield FD; Comstock RE
    Theor Appl Genet; 1969 Jan; 39(8):361-4. PubMed ID: 24435626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of ignoring full sib relationships when making half sib estimates of heritability.
    Jackson N
    Theor Appl Genet; 1983 Apr; 65(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 24263202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sire x herd interactions for weaning weight in beef cattle.
    Notter DR; Tier B; Meyer K
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2359-65. PubMed ID: 1506299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of data imbalance on estimation of heritability.
    Caro RF; Grossman M; Fernando RL
    Theor Appl Genet; 1985 Mar; 69(5-6):523-30. PubMed ID: 24254008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
    Mulder HA; Bijma P
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jan; 83(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 15583042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of dominance relationships on the estimation of dominance variance with sire-dam subclass effects.
    Gengler N; Van Vleck LD; MacNeil MD; Misztal I; Pariacote FA
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2885-91. PubMed ID: 9374300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of heritability of response to Rous sarcomas of chickens.
    Urban WE; Zervas NP; Collins WM; Buck RW; Aeed PA; Briles WE
    Poult Sci; 1985 Aug; 64(8):1405-10. PubMed ID: 2995957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of different egg quality traits and interpretation of their mode of inheritance in White Leghorns.
    Rath PK; Mishra PK; Mallick BK; Behura NC
    Vet World; 2015 Apr; 8(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 27047113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing the bias of estimates of genotype by environment interactions in random regression sire models.
    Lillehammer M; Odegård J; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Mar; 41(1):30. PubMed ID: 19296859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterogeneity of variance by sire breed, sex, and dam breed in 200- and 365-day weights of beef cattle from a top cross experiment.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV; Kachman SD
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2579-88. PubMed ID: 8582847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models.
    Ferreira GB; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2641-50. PubMed ID: 10521023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Symmetric differences squared and analysis of variance procedures for estimating genetic and environmental variances and covariances for beef cattle weaning weight: II. Estimates from a data set.
    Bruckner CM; Slanger WD
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Dec; 63(6):1794-803. PubMed ID: 3818460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between individual herd-heritability estimates and sire misidentification rate.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD; Zwald NR; Cowan CM; Meland OM
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Apr; 91(4):1640-7. PubMed ID: 18349256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parameter estimates for direct and maternal genetic effects on yearling, eighteen-month, and slaughter weights of Korean native cattle.
    Lee JW; Choi SB; Jung YH; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Jun; 78(6):1414-21. PubMed ID: 10875621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of sire misidentification on estimates of genetic parameters for birth and weaning weights in Hereford cattle.
    Senneke SL; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Aug; 82(8):2307-12. PubMed ID: 15318729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parental sex effect of parthenogenesis on progeny production and performance of Chinese Painted Quail (Coturnix chinensis).
    Ramachandran R; Nascimento Dos Santos M; Parker HM; McDaniel CD
    Theriogenology; 2018 Sep; 118():96-102. PubMed ID: 29886358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic heterogeneity of residual variance of hatch weight in Mazandaran native chicken.
    Yousefi Zonuz A; Alijani S; Rafat SA
    Br Poult Sci; 2019 Aug; 60(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 31046426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of sire misidentification on sire x year interaction variance and direct-maternal genetic covariance for weaning weight in beef cattle.
    Lee C; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 1997 Nov; 75(11):2858-63. PubMed ID: 9374297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.