These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24435901)

  • 1. Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.
    Fogerty D; Montgomery AA; Crass KA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Apr; 76(3):852-63. PubMed ID: 24435901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words.
    Orr SB; Montgomery AA; Healy EW; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3105-13. PubMed ID: 21110606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting word-recognition performance in noise by young listeners with normal hearing using acoustic, phonetic, and lexical variables.
    McArdle R; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):507-18. PubMed ID: 19253783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Possible words and fixed stress in the segmentation of Slovak speech.
    Hanulíková A; McQueen JM; Mitterer H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Mar; 63(3):555-79. PubMed ID: 19626577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Freyman RL; Nerbonne GP; Cote HA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 2046366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic-Phonetic Versus Lexical Processing in Nonnative Listeners Differing in Their Dominant Language.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Am J Audiol; 2016 Sep; 25(3):167-76. PubMed ID: 27386797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consonant/vowel asymmetry in early word form recognition.
    Poltrock S; Nazzi T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Mar; 131():135-48. PubMed ID: 25544396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.