199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24437284)
1. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Mar; 91(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 15060492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study.
Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A; Sevimay M; Soykan E; Unsal E
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Feb; 91(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 14970760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The influence of medial implant location in three-unit posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures on stress distribution in surrounding mandibular bone].
Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Dec; 69(4):263-8. PubMed ID: 12607959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the influence of implant location on the stress distribution for implant-supported fixed partial dentures].
Huang QF; Zhang FQ; Hu Y; Wang DM
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Aug; 17(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 18784882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.
Aboelfadl A; Keilig L; Ebeid K; Ahmed MAM; Nouh I; Refaie A; Bourauel C
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Apr; 24(1):455. PubMed ID: 38622680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: Finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity.
Ye Z; Ye H; Wu Y; Jiang Z; Yao H; Xu X; Zhang Y; Du W; Li W; Zheng Y; Ye P; Ding X; Wu L
Ann Anat; 2024 Apr; 253():152210. PubMed ID: 38244942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress analysis of effects of nonrigid connectors on fixed partial dentures with pier abutments.
Oruc S; Eraslan O; Tukay HA; Atay A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18319089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A; Güvener S
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Aug; 76(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 8820808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of dental prostheses supported by straight and angled implants.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; Cruz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 19587860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit.
Kunavisarut C; Lang LA; Stoner BR; Felton DA
J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 11935508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II: 3-D finite element stress analysis.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Implant Dent; 2001; 10(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 11813664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Cağlar A; Aydin C; Ozen J; Yilmaz C; Korkmaz T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16519180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
