391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24437784)
1. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics.
Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking.
Biberger T; Ewert SD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):1098. PubMed ID: 28863616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modifying the normalized covariance metric measure to account for nonlinear distortions introduced by noise-reduction algorithms.
Chen F; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL405-11. PubMed ID: 23656101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome measures based on classification performance fail to predict the intelligibility of binary-masked speech.
Kressner AA; May T; Rozell CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3033. PubMed ID: 27369123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility.
Rennies J; Warzybok A; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multi-resolution envelope-power based model for speech intelligibility.
Jørgensen S; Ewert SD; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):436-46. PubMed ID: 23862819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intelligibility prediction for speech mixed with white Gaussian noise at low signal-to-noise ratios.
Graetzer S; Hopkins C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1346. PubMed ID: 33639794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech based transmission index for all: An intelligibility metric for variable hearing ability.
Mechergui N; Djaziri-Larbi S; Jaïdane M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1470. PubMed ID: 28372108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of noise vocoding on speech quality perception.
Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Kates JM
Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():75-83. PubMed ID: 24333929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of the influence of reverberation on binaural speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet.
Rennies J; Brand T; Kollmeier B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2999-3012. PubMed ID: 22087928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of noise-reduced speech for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
Li J; Xia R; Ying D; Yan Y; Akagi M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3301. PubMed ID: 25480075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
Smiljanic R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A corpus of noise-induced word misperceptions for Spanish.
Tóth MA; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y; Cooke M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL184-9. PubMed ID: 25698048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility prediction based on modulation frequency-selective processing.
Relaño-Iborra H; Dau T
Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108610. PubMed ID: 36163219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Envelope and intensity based prediction of psychoacoustic masking and speech intelligibility.
Biberger T; Ewert SD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):1023. PubMed ID: 27586734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
