BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24439321)

  • 1. Influence of computed tomography angiography reconstruction software on anatomic measurements and endograft component selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Corriere MA; Islam A; Craven TE; Conlee TD; Hurie JB; Edwards MS
    J Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 59(5):1224-31.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24439321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Parker MV; O'Donnell SD; Chang AS; Johnson CA; Gillespie DL; Goff JM; Rasmussen TE; Rich NM
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 41(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15767998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in Apposition of Endograft Limbs in the Iliac Arteries After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Determination With New Computed Tomography-Applied Software.
    Goudeketting SR; Schuurmann RCL; Slump CH; de Vries JPM
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Dec; 26(6):843-852. PubMed ID: 31402731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcome and morphologic determinants of mural thrombus in abdominal aortic endografts.
    Oliveira NF; Bastos Gonçalves FM; Hoeks SE; Ten Raa S; Ultee KH; Rouwet E; Hendriks JM; Verhagen HJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 61(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 25736781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of gender and aortic aneurysm size on eligibility for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Sweet MP; Fillinger MF; Morrison TM; Abel D
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 21658895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a New Methodology to Determine 3-Dimensional Endograft Apposition, Position, and Expansion in the Aortic Neck After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.
    Schuurmann RCL; Overeem SP; van Noort K; de Vries BA; Slump CH; de Vries JPM
    J Endovasc Ther; 2018 Jun; 25(3):358-365. PubMed ID: 29623767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of dynamic computed tomographic angiography on endograft sizing for endovascular aneurysm repair.
    Pol JA; Truijers M; van der Vliet JA; Fillinger MF; Marra SP; Renema WK; Oostveen LJ; Kool LJ; Blankensteijn JD
    J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Oct; 16(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 19842723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonenhanced MRI Planning for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced CT Angiography.
    Piacentino F; Fontana F; Micieli C; Angeretti MG; Cardim LN; Coppola A; Molinelli V; Piffaretti G; Novario R; Fugazzola C
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2018 Jan; 52(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 29162027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT angiography in stent-graft sizing: impact of using inner vs. outer wall measurements of aortic neck diameters.
    Iezzi R; Dattesi R; Pirro F; Nestola M; Santoro M; Snider F; Bonomo L
    J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 21679062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional CT angiography in analysis of anatomical suitability for stentgraft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Pitoulias GA; Donas KP; Schulte S; Aslanidou EA; Papadimitriou DK
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Apr; 52(3):317-23. PubMed ID: 21498369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analysis of variables affecting aortic neck length with implications for fenestrated endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Stark M; Suresh A; Alexander J; Cragg A
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 May; 28(4):808-15. PubMed ID: 24200532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A New Methodology to Determine Apposition, Dilatation, and Position of Endografts in the Descending Thoracic Aorta After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.
    van Noort K; Schuurmann RCL; Post Hospers G; van der Weijde E; Smeenk HG; Heijmen RH; de Vries JPM
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Oct; 26(5):679-687. PubMed ID: 31257995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic feasibility of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in emergency in the era of the chimney technique: impact on an emergency endovascular kit.
    Brossier J; Coscas R; Capdevila C; Kitzis M; Coggia M; Goeau-Brissonniere O
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 27(7):844-50. PubMed ID: 23993103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decreased use of iliac extensions and reduced graft junctions with software-assisted centerline measurements in selection of endograft components for endovascular aneurysm repair.
    Velazquez OC; Woo EY; Carpenter JP; Golden MA; Barker CF; Fairman RM
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Aug; 40(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15297814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endograft conformability and aortoiliac tortuosity in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Lee K; Leci E; Forbes T; Dubois L; DeRose G; Power A
    J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Oct; 21(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 25290803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound- and centerline computed tomography-determined aortic diameters during thoracic endovascular aortic repair.
    Han SM; Elsayed RS; Ham SW; Mahajan A; Fleischman F; Rowe VL; Cunningham MJ; Weaver FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2017 Oct; 66(4):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 28648482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of the Simbionix PROcedure Rehearsal Studio sizing module: A comparison of software for endovascular aneurysm repair sizing and planning.
    Velu JF; Groot Jebbink E; de Vries JP; Slump CH; Geelkerken RH
    Vascular; 2017 Feb; 25(1):80-85. PubMed ID: 27216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Precise Are Preinterventional Measurements Using Centerline Analysis Applications? Objective Ground Truth Evaluation Reveals Software-Specific Centerline Characteristics.
    Hoegen P; Wörz S; Müller-Eschner M; Geisbüsch P; Liao W; Rohr K; Schmitt M; Rengier F; Kauczor HU; von Tengg-Kobligk H
    J Endovasc Ther; 2017 Aug; 24(4):584-594. PubMed ID: 28587563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel method to estimate iliac tortuosity in evaluating EVAR access.
    Kristmundsson T; Sonesson B; Resch T
    J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Apr; 19(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 22545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The benefits of EVAR planning using a 3D workstation.
    Sobocinski J; Chenorhokian H; Maurel B; Midulla M; Hertault A; Le Roux M; Azzaoui R; Haulon S
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 46(4):418-23. PubMed ID: 23972762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.