148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24439949)
1. Fracture risk perception study: patient self-perceptions of bone health often disagree with calculated fracture risk.
Grover ML; Edwards FD; Chang YH; Cook CB; Behrens MC; Dueck AC
Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(1):e69-75. PubMed ID: 24439949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [FRAX® thresholds to identify people with high or low risk of osteoporotic fracture in Spanish female population].
Azagra R; Roca G; Martín-Sánchez JC; Casado E; Encabo G; Zwart M; Aguyé A; Díez-Pérez A;
Med Clin (Barc); 2015 Jan; 144(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 24461732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select subgroups of normal and osteoporotic patients.
Hamdy RC; Kiebzak GM
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 19201635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary care use of FRAX: absolute fracture risk assessment in postmenopausal women and older men.
Siris ES; Baim S; Nattiv A
Postgrad Med; 2010 Jan; 122(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 20107292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low self-awareness of osteoporosis and fracture risk among postmenopausal women.
Langer FW; da Silveira Codevilla AA; Bringhenti R; Dal Osto LC; Campos TR; Martins TT; Barin AE; Rigo PH; Boufleuer ND; Santinon SF; Kipper K; Rodrigues J; Premaor MO
Arch Osteoporos; 2016 Dec; 11(1):27. PubMed ID: 27503622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ten-year absolute fracture risk and hip bone strength in Canadian women with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Lee JJ; Aghdassi E; Cheung AM; Morrison S; Cymet A; Peeva V; Neville C; Hewitt S; DaCosta D; Pineau C; Pope J; Fortin PR
J Rheumatol; 2012 Jul; 39(7):1378-84. PubMed ID: 22660811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. FRAX® counseling for bone health behavior change in women 50 years of age and older.
Dunniway DL; Camune B; Baldwin K; Crane JK
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2012 Jun; 24(6):382-9. PubMed ID: 22672490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture assessment tool risk scores in bone density reports do not change physician prescribing behavior for osteoporosis.
Izuora KE; Alazraki N; Byrd-Sellers J; Tangpricha V; Nanes MS
Am J Med Sci; 2011 Jul; 342(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 21412137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular bone structure, bone mineral density, and clinical variables as fracture predictors: a 15-year follow-up of female patients in a dental clinic.
Jonasson G; Billhult A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Sep; 116(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 23953422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®): applications in clinical practice.
Watts NB
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Apr; 20(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 21438699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is there an interaction between socioeconomic status and FRAX 10-year fracture probability determined with and without bone density measures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study of female cohort.
Brennan SL; Quirk SE; Hosking SM; Kotowicz MA; Holloway KL; Moloney DJ; Dobbins AG; Pasco JA
Calcif Tissue Int; 2015 Feb; 96(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 25578145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture risk prediction in outpatients from Krakow Region using FRAX tool versus fracture risk in 11-year follow-up.
Czerwiński E; Borowy P; Kumorek A; Amarowicz J; Górkiewicz M; Milert A
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2013; 15(6):617-28. PubMed ID: 24662908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008 Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis and the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX): what they mean to the bone densitometrist and bone technologist.
Watts NB; Lewiecki EM; Miller PD; Baim S
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(4):473-7. PubMed ID: 18562228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Self-perception of fracture risk: what can it tell us?
Litwic AE; Compston JE; Wyman A; Siris ES; Gehlbach SH; Adachi JD; Chapurlat R; Díez-Pérez A; LaCroix AZ; Nieves JW; Netelenbos JC; Pfeilschifter J; Rossini M; Roux C; Saag KG; Silverman S; Watts NB; Greenspan SL; March L; Gregson CL; Cooper C; Dennison EM;
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Dec; 28(12):3495-3500. PubMed ID: 28861636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone health management in prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy.
Dhanapal V; Reeves DJ
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2012 Mar; 18(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 21807761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the fracture risk assessment on patient and physician behavior in osteoporosis prevention.
McConaha JL; Berdine HJ; Skomo ML; Laux RV; Higginbotham SK; O'Neil CK
J Pharm Pract; 2014 Feb; 27(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 24108433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of cortical porosity of the proximal femur improves identification of women with nonvertebral fragility fractures.
Ahmed LA; Shigdel R; Joakimsen RM; Eldevik OP; Eriksen EF; Ghasem-Zadeh A; Bala Y; Zebaze R; Seeman E; Bjørnerem Å
Osteoporos Int; 2015 Aug; 26(8):2137-46. PubMed ID: 25876879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The assessment of fracture risk.
Unnanuntana A; Gladnick BP; Donnelly E; Lane JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):743-53. PubMed ID: 20194335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controversies Surrounding the BMD Reporting Standard for the Determination of 10-Year Absolute Fracture Risk: A Canadian Perspective.
Siminoski K; O'Keeffe M; Akincioglu C; Ganguli SN; Levesque J; Raaphorst P; Tarulli G; Thurston W; Lyons D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):483-489. PubMed ID: 32162532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
