712 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24440235)
1. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging in the decision to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles at robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Park BH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Jeon SS
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 24440235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Takriti S; Smiszek R; Engelhard K; Nutzel R; Kuhn R
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.
Roethke MC; Lichy MP; Kniess M; Werner MK; Claussen CD; Stenzl A; Schlemmer HP; Schilling D
World J Urol; 2013 Oct; 31(5):1111-6. PubMed ID: 22249342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative prediction of neurovascular bundle involvement of localized prostate cancer by combined T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging of magnetic resonance imaging, number of positive biopsy cores, and Gleason score.
Naiki T; Okamura T; Nagata D; Mori Y; Kawai N; Ogawa K; Akita H; Hashimoto Y; Tozawa K; Kohri K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):909-13. PubMed ID: 21790224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.
Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
McClure TD; Margolis DJ; Reiter RE; Sayre JW; Thomas MA; Nagarajan R; Gulati M; Raman SS
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):874-83. PubMed ID: 22274837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI Displays the Prostatic Cancer Anatomy and Improves the Bundles Management Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Schiavina R; Bianchi L; Borghesi M; Dababneh H; Chessa F; Pultrone CV; Angiolini A; Gaudiano C; Porreca A; Fiorentino M; De Groote R; D'Hondt F; De Naeyer G; Mottrie A; Brunocilla E
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):315-321. PubMed ID: 29256639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.
Tan N; Shen L; Khoshnoodi P; Alcalá HE; Yu W; Hsu W; Reiter RE; Lu DY; Raman SS
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1218-1223. PubMed ID: 29128577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Multiparametric MR imaging-directed intraoperative frozen-section analysis to reduce the rate of positive surgical margins.
Petralia G; Musi G; Padhani AR; Summers P; Renne G; Alessi S; Raimondi S; Matei DV; Renne SL; Jereczek-Fossa BA; De Cobelli O; Bellomi M
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):434-44. PubMed ID: 25271856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical safety and feasibility of a newly developed, simple algorithm for decision-making on neurovascular bundle preservation in radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Hisasue S; Masumori N; Kobayashi K; Kato R; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 40(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 19959505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
