These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24440749)

  • 21. Cognitive control of gaze in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
    Thakkar KN; Schall JD; Logan GD; Park S
    Psychiatry Res; 2015 Feb; 225(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 25601802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of inhibitory control depends on procrastination and deceleration in saccade planning.
    Indrajeet I; Ray S
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Oct; 238(10):2417-2432. PubMed ID: 32776172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.
    Mirabella G; Pani P; Paré M; Ferraina S
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 174(2):240-55. PubMed ID: 16636792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inhibitory effects on response force in the stop-signal paradigm.
    Ko YT; Alsford T; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):465-77. PubMed ID: 22288696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inhibiting responses to difficult choices.
    Matzke D; Curley S; Gong CQ; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):124-142. PubMed ID: 30596441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A within-trial measure of the stop signal reaction time in a head-unrestrained oculomotor countermanding task.
    Goonetilleke SC; Doherty TJ; Corneil BD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Dec; 104(6):3677-90. PubMed ID: 20962073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Countermanding saccades: evidence against independent processing of go and stop signals.
    Ozyurt J; Colonius H; Arndt PA
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Apr; 65(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 12785072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.
    Kornylo K; Dill N; Saenz M; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 89(6):2984-99. PubMed ID: 12783947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements.
    Mirabella G; Pani P; Ferraina S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):996-1010. PubMed ID: 19378414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Looking before you leap: a theory of motivated control of action.
    Liddle EB; Scerif G; Hollis CP; Batty MJ; Groom MJ; Liotti M; Liddle PF
    Cognition; 2009 Jul; 112(1):141-58. PubMed ID: 19409540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cerebellar damage impairs executive control and monitoring of movement generation.
    Brunamonti E; Chiricozzi FR; Clausi S; Olivito G; Giusti MA; Molinari M; Ferraina S; Leggio M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85997. PubMed ID: 24465830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Controlled movement processing: evidence for a common inhibitory control of finger, wrist, and arm movements.
    Brunamonti E; Ferraina S; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2012 Jul; 215():69-78. PubMed ID: 22554783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.
    Gulberti A; Arndt PA; Colonius H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():61. PubMed ID: 24600371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.
    Colonius H; Ozyurt J; Arndt PA
    Vision Res; 2001 Jul; 41(15):1951-68. PubMed ID: 11412886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sex differences in inhibitory control in socially-housed baboons (Papio papio).
    Lacreuse A; Gullstrand J; Fagot J
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 312():231-7. PubMed ID: 27321783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A "gap effect" on stop signal reaction times in a human saccadic countermanding task.
    Stevenson SA; Elsley JK; Corneil BD
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 101(2):580-90. PubMed ID: 19019975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proactive and reactive inhibitory control in rats.
    Mayse JD; Nelson GM; Park P; Gallagher M; Lin SC
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():104. PubMed ID: 24847204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.
    Salinas E; Stanford TR
    J Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 33(13):5668-85. PubMed ID: 23536081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance monitoring and stop signal inhibition in abstinent patients with cocaine dependence.
    Li CS; Milivojevic V; Kemp K; Hong K; Sinha R
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2006 Dec; 85(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 16725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.