BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24440881)

  • 21. Occupational relevance and body mass bias in military physical fitness tests.
    Vanderburgh PM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Aug; 40(8):1538-45. PubMed ID: 18614935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A survey to identify physically demanding tasks performed during storm damage operations by Australian State Emergency Services personnel.
    Larsen B; Graham T; Aisbett B
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 22835624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Physiological consequences of U.S. Army Ranger training.
    Nindl BC; Barnes BR; Alemany JA; Frykman PN; Shippee RL; Friedl KE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2007 Aug; 39(8):1380-7. PubMed ID: 17762372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Revalidating U.S. Army soldiers' perceptions of combat arms job tasks: Frequencies, importance and expectations of performance.
    Boye MW; Cohen BS; Canino MC; Foulis SA; Sharp MA
    Work; 2021; 70(3):997-1007. PubMed ID: 34744046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Muscle structure and aerobic performance capacity in recruit training school].
    Hofer P; Hoppeler H; Kayar SR; Howald H
    Schweiz Z Sportmed; 1990 Apr; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 2112265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on sit-up performance.
    Childs JD; Teyhen DS; Benedict TM; Morris JB; Fortenberry AD; McQueen RM; Preston JB; Wright AC; Dugan JL; George SZ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Nov; 41(11):2072-83. PubMed ID: 19812508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Different Variants of the U.S. Army Occupational Physical Assessment Test.
    Spiering BA; Taylor KM; Cohen BS; Smith NI; Zeppetelli DJ; Pecorelli VP; Bartlett PM; Walker LA; Frykman PN; Foulis SA
    Mil Med; 2022 Mar; 187(3-4):e410-e417. PubMed ID: 33576411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ambulatory physical activity in Swiss Army recruits.
    Wyss T; Scheffler J; Mäder U
    Int J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 33(9):716-22. PubMed ID: 22706943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences in physical fitness of male and female recruits in gender-integrated army basic training.
    Yanovich R; Evans R; Israeli E; Constantini N; Sharvit N; Merkel D; Epstein Y; Moran DS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Nov; 40(11 Suppl):S654-9. PubMed ID: 18849869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The influence of U.S. Army Basic Initial Entry Training on the muscular strength of men and women.
    Knapik JJ; Wright JE; Kowal DM; Vogel JA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1980 Oct; 51(10):1086-90. PubMed ID: 7469950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Occupational and non-occupational injuries in the United States Army: focus on gender.
    Tiesman HM; Peek-Asa CL; Zwerling CS; Sprince NL; Amoroso PJ
    Am J Prev Med; 2007 Dec; 33(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 18022062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Establishing a physical criterion for assigning personnel to U.S. Air Force jobs.
    Ayoub MM; Jiang BC; Smith JL; Selan JL; McDaniel JW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 May; 48(5):464-70. PubMed ID: 3591669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between the U.S. Navy fleet diver physical screening test and job task performance.
    Marcinik EJ; Hyde DE; Taylor WF
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Apr; 66(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 7794223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of physical fitness as risk indicator of increased low back pain intensity among people working with physically and mentally disabled persons: a 30-month prospective study.
    Strøyer J; Jensen LD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 18317201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Epidemiology of injuries associated with physical training among young men in the army.
    Jones BH; Cowan DN; Tomlinson JP; Robinson JR; Polly DW; Frykman PN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Feb; 25(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 8450721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gender differences in the association of age with physical workload and functioning.
    Aittomäki A; Lahelma E; Roos E; Leino-Arjas P; Martikainen P
    Occup Environ Med; 2005 Feb; 62(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 15657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physical fitness, BMI and sickness absence in male military personnel.
    Kyröläinen H; Häkkinen K; Kautiainen H; Santtila M; Pihlainen K; Häkkinen A
    Occup Med (Lond); 2008 Jun; 58(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 18296685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the Strength Aptitude Test and Other Fitness Tests to Qualify Air Force Recruits for Physically Demanding Specialties.
    Robson S; Pezard S; Lytell MC; Sims CS; Boon JE; Etchegaray JM; Robbins M; Schulker D; Sollinger JM; Campbell JH; Atler A; Seabrook SB; Gebhardt DL; Baker TA; Volpe EK; Linnenkohl KA
    Rand Health Q; 2019 May; 8(3):8. PubMed ID: 31205808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical capacity of rescue personnel in the mining industry.
    Stewart IB; McDonald MD; Hunt AP; Parker TW
    J Occup Med Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 3():22. PubMed ID: 18847510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction of performance on two stretcher-carry tasks.
    Rice VJ; Sharp MA
    Work; 1994; 4(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 24440953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.