BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24441213)

  • 1. A test of the metabolic cost of cushioning hypothesis during unshod and shod running.
    Tung KD; Franz JR; Kram R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):324-9. PubMed ID: 24441213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better?
    Franz JR; Wierzbinski CM; Kram R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Aug; 44(8):1519-25. PubMed ID: 22367745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect?
    Divert C; Mornieux G; Freychat P; Baly L; Mayer F; Belli A
    Int J Sports Med; 2008 Jun; 29(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 18027308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of shod/unshod condition and running speed on foot-strike patterns, inversion/eversion, and vertical foot rotation in endurance runners.
    Muñoz-Jimenez M; Latorre-Román PA; Soto-Hermoso VM; García-Pinillos F
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(19):2035-42. PubMed ID: 25812907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.
    Chambon N; Delattre N; Guéguen N; Berton E; Rao G
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2015 May; 115(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 25501676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative biomechanical analysis of habitually unshod and shod runners based on a foot morphological difference.
    Mei Q; Fernandez J; Fu W; Feng N; Gu Y
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():38-53. PubMed ID: 25964998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acute effect of different minimalist shoes on foot strike pattern and kinematics in rearfoot strikers during running.
    Squadrone R; Rodano R; Hamill J; Preatoni E
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(11):1196-204. PubMed ID: 25529114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.
    Dixon SJ
    Ergonomics; 2008 Oct; 51(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 18803091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metabolic responses of running shod and barefoot in mid-forefoot runners.
    Vincent HK; Montero C; Conrad BP; Seay A; Edenfield K; Vincent KR
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2014 Aug; 54(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 24777114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oxygen cost of running barefoot vs. running shod.
    Hanson NJ; Berg K; Deka P; Meendering JR; Ryan C
    Int J Sports Med; 2011 Jun; 32(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 21472628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot: a biomechanical study.
    Bonacci J; Saunders PU; Hicks A; Rantalainen T; Vicenzino BG; Spratford W
    Br J Sports Med; 2013 Apr; 47(6):387-92. PubMed ID: 23314887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of a five-toed minimal protection shoe on static and dynamic ankle position sense.
    Squadrone R; Gallozzi C
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2011 Sep; 51(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 21904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the cushioning running shoes in ground contact time of phases of gait.
    Roca-Dols A; Losa-Iglesias ME; Sánchez-Gómez R; Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R; López-López D; Rodríguez-Sanz D; Martínez-Jiménez EM; Calvo-Lobo C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():196-200. PubMed ID: 30179793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Running Economy While Running in Shoes Categorized as Maximal Cushioning.
    Mercer MA; Stone TM; Young JC; Mercer JA
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2018; 11(2):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 30338016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foot strike pattern in children during shod-unshod running.
    Latorre Román PÁ; Balboa FR; Pinillos FG
    Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():220-222. PubMed ID: 28806710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Durability of running shoes with ethylene vinyl acetate or polyurethane midsoles.
    Wang L; Hong Y; Li JX
    J Sports Sci; 2012 Dec; 30(16):1787-92. PubMed ID: 22967232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy.
    Perl DP; Daoud AI; Lieberman DE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Jul; 44(7):1335-43. PubMed ID: 22217565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical and physiological examination of barefoot and shod conditions in female runners.
    Paulson S; Braun WA
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 35(9):789-93. PubMed ID: 24577857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies.
    Dinato RC; Ribeiro AP; Butugan MK; Pereira IL; Onodera AN; Sacco IC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jan; 18(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 24444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.