These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24441266)

  • 1. Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: evidence from an information intrusion paradigm.
    Söllner A; Bröder A; Glöckner A; Betsch T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():84-96. PubMed ID: 24441266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():167-84. PubMed ID: 26687019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toolbox or adjustable spanner? A critical comparison of two metaphors for adaptive decision making.
    Söllner A; Bröder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):215-37. PubMed ID: 26375785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Take-the-best and the influence of decision-inconsistent attributes on decision confidence and choices in memory-based decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J
    Memory; 2016 Nov; 24(10):1435-43. PubMed ID: 26642913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence accumulation in decision making: unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" models.
    Lee MD; Cummins TD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 15260204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.
    Berkowitsch NA; Scheibehenne B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1331-48. PubMed ID: 24364681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach to searching and stopping in multi-attribute judgment.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Moore CP; Lee MD; Newell BR
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1384-405. PubMed ID: 24646326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How short- and long-run aspirations impact search and choice in decisions from experience.
    Wulff DU; Hills TT; Hertwig R
    Cognition; 2015 Nov; 144():29-37. PubMed ID: 26218515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How target-lure similarity shapes confidence judgments in multiple-alternative decision tasks.
    Horry R; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Dec; 145(12):1615-1634. PubMed ID: 27736136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haunted by a doppelgänger: irrelevant facial similarity affects rule-based judgments.
    von Helversen B; Herzog SM; Rieskamp J
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 23895921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Postdecisional Neural Marker of Confidence Predicts Information-Seeking in Decision-Making.
    Desender K; Murphy P; Boldt A; Verguts T; Yeung N
    J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(17):3309-3319. PubMed ID: 30804091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absolutely relative or relatively absolute: violations of value invariance in human decision making.
    Teodorescu AR; Moran R; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 26022836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strength and weight: The determinants of choice and confidence.
    Kvam PD; Pleskac TJ
    Cognition; 2016 Jul; 152():170-180. PubMed ID: 27093221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgment and decision making.
    Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making assessments while taking repeated risks: a pattern of multiple response pathways.
    Pleskac TJ; Wershbale A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):142-62. PubMed ID: 23276285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing psychologically plausible choice models.
    Heck DW; Hilbig BE; Moshagen M
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():26-40. PubMed ID: 28601709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account.
    Moran R; Teodorescu AR; Usher M
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 May; 78():99-147. PubMed ID: 25868113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for memory-based decision making: Modeling behavioral and neural signatures within a cognitive architecture.
    Fechner HB; Pachur T; Schooler LJ; Mehlhorn K; Battal C; Volz KG; Borst JP
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():77-99. PubMed ID: 27597646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confidence in masked orientation judgments is informed by both evidence and visibility.
    Rausch M; Hellmann S; Zehetleitner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):134-154. PubMed ID: 29043657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.