These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2444158)

  • 1. The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion.
    van Loosdrecht MC; Lyklema J; Norde W; Schraa G; Zehnder AJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Aug; 53(8):1893-7. PubMed ID: 2444158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relations between hydrophobicity tested by three methods and surface chemical composition of Escherichia coli.
    Latrache H; El GA; Karroua M; Hakkou A; Ait MH; El BA; Bourlioux P
    New Microbiol; 2002 Jan; 25(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 11837394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrophoretic mobility and hydrophobicity as a measured to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion.
    van Loosdrecht MC; Lyklema J; Norde W; Schraa G; Zehnder AJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Aug; 53(8):1898-901. PubMed ID: 3662520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the hydrophobic properties of latex microspheres and Bacillus spores. Influence of the particle size on the data obtained by the MATH method (microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons).
    Faille C; Lemy C; Allion-Maurer A; Zoueshtiagh F
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2019 Oct; 182():110398. PubMed ID: 31376688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of contact angles and adhesion to hexadecane of urogenital, dairy, and poultry lactobacilli: effect of serial culture passages.
    Reid G; Cuperus PL; Bruce AW; van der Mei HC; Tomeczek L; Khoury AH; Busscher HJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1992 May; 58(5):1549-53. PubMed ID: 1622224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses.
    Bruinsma GM; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3217-24. PubMed ID: 11700793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased cell surface hydrophobicity of a Serratia marcescens NS 38 mutant lacking wetting activity.
    Bar-Ness R; Avrahamy N; Matsuyama T; Rosenberg M
    J Bacteriol; 1988 Sep; 170(9):4361-4. PubMed ID: 3045093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to hydrophilic contact lenses and other substrata.
    Miller MJ; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Aug; 25(8):1392-7. PubMed ID: 3114317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with adherence to and biofilm formation on polystyrene by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: the role of cell surface hydrophobicity and motility.
    Pompilio A; Piccolomini R; Picciani C; D'Antonio D; Savini V; Di Bonaventura G
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2008 Oct; 287(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 18681866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cell surface hydrophobicity of sucrose fermenting and nonfermenting Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains evaluated by different methods.
    Mattos-Guaraldi AL; Formiga LC; Andrade AF
    Curr Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 38(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9841780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell surface energy, contact angles and phase partition. I. Lymphocytic cell lines in biphasic aqueous mixtures.
    Gerson DF
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 1980 Nov; 602(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 6159002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanism of enhancement of microbial cell hydrophobicity by cationic polymers.
    Goldberg S; Doyle RJ; Rosenberg M
    J Bacteriol; 1990 Oct; 172(10):5650-4. PubMed ID: 2211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of cell/medium interfacial tensions from contact angles in aqueous polymer systems.
    Schürch S; Gerson DF; McIver DJ
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 1981 Jan; 640(2):557-71. PubMed ID: 6163485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive role of cell wall anchored proteinase PrtP in adhesion of lactococci.
    Habimana O; Le Goff C; Juillard V; Bellon-Fontaine MN; Buist G; Kulakauskas S; Briandet R
    BMC Microbiol; 2007 May; 7():36. PubMed ID: 17474995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydrophobic adherence and phase variation in Bordetella pertussis.
    Fish F; Navon Y; Goldman S
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 176(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 2881193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cell surface damage on surface properties and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Bruinsma GM; Rustema-Abbing M; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2001 Jun; 45(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11311394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemagglutination (fimbriae) and hydrophobicity in adherence of Serratia marcescens to urinary tract epithelium and contact lenses.
    Parment PA; Svanborg-Ede'n C; Chaknis MJ; Sawant AD; Hagberg L; Wilson LA; Ahearn DG
    Curr Microbiol; 1992 Aug; 25(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 1369499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cell surface hydrophobicity and slime production of Staphylococcus epidermidis Brazilian isolates.
    Krepsky N; Rocha Ferreira RB; Ferreira Nunes AP; Casado Lins UG; Costa e Silva Filho F; de Mattos-Guaraldi AL; Netto-dosSantos KR
    Curr Microbiol; 2003 Apr; 46(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 12732978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesion and biofilm formation on polystyrene by drinking water-isolated bacteria.
    Simões LC; Simões M; Vieira MJ
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2010 Oct; 98(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 20405208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison of 2 methods for determining the hydrophobicity of Streptococcus groups A and B].
    Ravdonikas LE; Dmitrieva NF; Grabovskaia KB
    Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol; 1988 Oct; (10):15-8. PubMed ID: 3064502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.