These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24442160)

  • 1. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
    Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
    Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-efficient CT colonography interpretation using an advanced image-gallery-based, computer-aided "first-reader" workflow for the detection of colorectal adenomas.
    Mang T; Hermosillo G; Wolf M; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Raykar V; Ringl H; Weber M; Mueller-Mang C; Graser A
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Dec; 22(12):2768-79. PubMed ID: 22903619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
    Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative performance of a primary-reader and second-reader paradigm of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Miyake M; Iinuma G; Taylor SA; Halligan S; Morimoto T; Ichikawa T; Tomimatsu H; Beddoe G; Sugimura K; Arai Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2013 May; 31(5):310-9. PubMed ID: 23420274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
    Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps in CT colonography with and without fecal tagging: a stand-alone evaluation.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Wolf M; Raykar V; Macari M; Pickhardt PJ; Iafrate F; Laghi A; Weber M; Baker ME; Ringl H; Herold CJ; Graser A
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 21934519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Taylor SA; Greenhalgh R; Ilangovan R; Tam E; Sahni VA; Burling D; Zhang J; Bassett P; Pickhardt PJ; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18292478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
    Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of computer-aided detection for the assessment of pulmonary arterial filling defects at computed tomographic angiography.
    Walsham AC; Roberts HC; Kashani HM; Mongiardi CN; Ng YL; Patsios DA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):913-8. PubMed ID: 19204454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.
    Halligan S; Mallett S; Altman DG; McQuillan J; Proud M; Beddoe G; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 21084409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CAD: how it works, how to use it, performance.
    Regge D; Halligan S
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1171-6. PubMed ID: 22595503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.