308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24442160)
1. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-efficient CT colonography interpretation using an advanced image-gallery-based, computer-aided "first-reader" workflow for the detection of colorectal adenomas.
Mang T; Hermosillo G; Wolf M; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Raykar V; Ringl H; Weber M; Mueller-Mang C; Graser A
Eur Radiol; 2012 Dec; 22(12):2768-79. PubMed ID: 22903619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative performance of a primary-reader and second-reader paradigm of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a low-prevalence screening population.
Miyake M; Iinuma G; Taylor SA; Halligan S; Morimoto T; Ichikawa T; Tomimatsu H; Beddoe G; Sugimura K; Arai Y
Jpn J Radiol; 2013 May; 31(5):310-9. PubMed ID: 23420274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps in CT colonography with and without fecal tagging: a stand-alone evaluation.
Mang T; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Wolf M; Raykar V; Macari M; Pickhardt PJ; Iafrate F; Laghi A; Weber M; Baker ME; Ringl H; Herold CJ; Graser A
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 21934519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
Taylor SA; Greenhalgh R; Ilangovan R; Tam E; Sahni VA; Burling D; Zhang J; Bassett P; Pickhardt PJ; Halligan S
Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18292478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.
Paquerault S; Samuelson FW; Petrick N; Myers KJ; Smith RC
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1095-107. PubMed ID: 19523855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of computer-aided detection for the assessment of pulmonary arterial filling defects at computed tomographic angiography.
Walsham AC; Roberts HC; Kashani HM; Mongiardi CN; Ng YL; Patsios DA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):913-8. PubMed ID: 19204454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.
Halligan S; Mallett S; Altman DG; McQuillan J; Proud M; Beddoe G; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 21084409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CAD: how it works, how to use it, performance.
Regge D; Halligan S
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1171-6. PubMed ID: 22595503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
