These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24442315)

  • 1. Signatures of selection in five Italian cattle breeds detected by a 54K SNP panel.
    Mancini G; Gargani M; Chillemi G; Nicolazzi EL; Marsan PA; Valentini A; Pariset L
    Mol Biol Rep; 2014 Feb; 41(2):957-65. PubMed ID: 24442315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of canonical discriminant analysis to study signatures of selection in cattle.
    Sorbolini S; Gaspa G; Steri R; Dimauro C; Cellesi M; Stella A; Marras G; Marsan PA; Valentini A; Macciotta NP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Aug; 48(1):58. PubMed ID: 27521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression to study selection signatures in Piedmontese and Italian Brown cattle breeds.
    Pintus E; Sorbolini S; Albera A; Gaspa G; Dimauro C; Steri R; Marras G; Macciotta NP
    Anim Genet; 2014 Feb; 45(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 23889699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative extended haplotype homozygosity signals across breeds reveal dairy and beef specific signatures of selection.
    Bomba L; Nicolazzi EL; Milanesi M; Negrini R; Mancini G; Biscarini F; Stella A; Valentini A; Ajmone-Marsan P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):25. PubMed ID: 25888030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of site and haplotype-frequency based approaches for detecting selection signatures in cattle.
    Qanbari S; Gianola D; Hayes B; Schenkel F; Miller S; Moore S; Thaller G; Simianer H
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Jun; 12():318. PubMed ID: 21679429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preselection statistics and Random Forest classification identify population informative single nucleotide polymorphisms in cosmopolitan and autochthonous cattle breeds.
    Bertolini F; Galimberti G; Schiavo G; Mastrangelo S; Di Gerlando R; Strillacci MG; Bagnato A; Portolano B; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2018 Jan; 12(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 28643617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of runs of homozygosity and their relationship with inbreeding in five cattle breeds farmed in Italy.
    Marras G; Gaspa G; Sorbolini S; Dimauro C; Ajmone-Marsan P; Valentini A; Williams JL; Macciotta NP
    Anim Genet; 2015 Apr; 46(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 25530322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between Podolic cattle breeds assessed by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyping.
    Pariset L; Mariotti M; Nardone A; Soysal MI; Ozkan E; Williams JL; Dunner S; Leveziel H; Maróti-Agóts A; Bodò I; Valentini A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 21077972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of selection signatures in Piemontese and Marchigiana cattle, two breeds with similar production aptitudes but different selection histories.
    Sorbolini S; Marras G; Gaspa G; Dimauro C; Cellesi M; Valentini A; Macciotta NP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jun; 47(1):52. PubMed ID: 26100250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined use of principal component analysis and random forests identify population-informative single nucleotide polymorphisms: application in cattle breeds.
    Bertolini F; Galimberti G; Calò DG; Schiavo G; Matassino D; Fontanesi L
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):346-56. PubMed ID: 25781205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-wide variability and selection signatures in Italian island cattle breeds.
    Cesarani A; Sorbolini S; Criscione A; Bordonaro S; Pulina G; Battacone G; Marletta D; Gaspa G; Macciotta NPP
    Anim Genet; 2018 Oct; 49(5):371-383. PubMed ID: 30070013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The genome-wide structure of two economically important indigenous Sicilian cattle breeds.
    Mastrangelo S; Saura M; Tolone M; Salces-Ortiz J; Di Gerlando R; Bertolini F; Fontanesi L; Sardina MT; Serrano M; Portolano B
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):4833-42. PubMed ID: 25253807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative selection signature analyses identify genomic footprints in Reggiana cattle, the traditional breed of the Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese production system.
    Bertolini F; Schiavo G; Bovo S; Sardina MT; Mastrangelo S; Dall'Olio S; Portolano B; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2020 May; 14(5):921-932. PubMed ID: 31928542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic diversity and genomic signatures of selection among cattle breeds from Siberia, eastern and northern Europe.
    Iso-Touru T; Tapio M; Vilkki J; Kiseleva T; Ammosov I; Ivanova Z; Popov R; Ozerov M; Kantanen J
    Anim Genet; 2016 Dec; 47(6):647-657. PubMed ID: 27629771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of Genetic Structure and Signatures of Selection in Three Strains of Tanzania Shorthorn Zebu, Boran and Friesian Cattle by Genome-Wide SNP Analyses.
    Msalya G; Kim ES; Laisser EL; Kipanyula MJ; Karimuribo ED; Kusiluka LJ; Chenyambuga SW; Rothschild MF
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0171088. PubMed ID: 28129396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genome-wide analysis reveals genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Qinchuan beef cattle.
    Yu H; Zhang K; Cheng G; Mei C; Wang H; Zan L
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Jun; 25(1):558. PubMed ID: 38834950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome wide signatures of positive selection: the comparison of independent samples and the identification of regions associated to traits.
    Barendse W; Harrison BE; Bunch RJ; Thomas MB; Turner LB
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():178. PubMed ID: 19393047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations.
    Su G; Brøndum RF; Ma P; Guldbrandtsen B; Aamand GP; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4657-65. PubMed ID: 22818480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.