These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Basic laparoscopic training using the Simbionix LAP Mentor: setting the standards in the novice group. von Websky MW; Vitz M; Raptis DA; Rosenthal R; Clavien PA; Hahnloser D J Surg Educ; 2012; 69(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 22677582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the learning of laparoscopic skills be quantified by the measurements of skill parameters performed in a virtual reality simulator? Sandy NS; Cruz JA; Passerotti CC; Nguyen H; Reis ST; Gouveia EM; Duarte RJ; Bruschini H; Srougi M Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 23849568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instrument Motion Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Fransson BA; Chen CY; Noyes JA; Ragle CA Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O5-O13. PubMed ID: 27239013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a Novel Inverted Peg Transfer Task: Advancing Beyond the Regular Peg Transfer Task for Surgical Simulation-Based Assessment. Abdelrahman AM; Yu D; Lowndes BR; Buckarma EH; Gas BL; Farley DR; Bingener J; Hallbeck MS J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):836-843. PubMed ID: 29037821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Kundhal PS; Grantcharov TP Surg Endosc; 2009 Mar; 23(3):645-9. PubMed ID: 18622548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does laparoscopic simulation predict intraoperative performance? A comparison between the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics. Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman LM; Vergis AS Am J Surg; 2015 Jan; 209(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25454953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator. Nemani A; Ahn W; Cooper C; Schwaitzberg S; De S Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 28812196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which skills really matter? proving face, content, and construct validity for a commercial robotic simulator. Lyons C; Goldfarb D; Jones SL; Badhiwala N; Miles B; Link R; Dunkin BJ Surg Endosc; 2013 Jun; 27(6):2020-30. PubMed ID: 23389060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics may not correlate with operative performance in a novice cohort. Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman L; Vergis AS Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():30024. PubMed ID: 26641071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motion Analysis-Based Skills Training and Assessment in Pediatric Laparoscopy: Construct, Concurrent, and Content Validity for the eoSim Simulator. Retrosi G; Cundy T; Haddad M; Clarke S J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Nov; 25(11):944-50. PubMed ID: 26259166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a Visual-Spatial Secondary Task to Assess Automaticity in Laparoscopic Skills. Castillo R; Alvarado J; Moreno P; Billeke P; Martínez C; Varas J; Jarufe N J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(4):1001-1005. PubMed ID: 29287751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]