These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24443478)
1. Assessment of US pathway for approving medical devices for rare conditions. Hwang TJ; Carpenter D; Kesselheim AS BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g217. PubMed ID: 24443478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: medical devices. ; Berry MD Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Jan; ():1-38. PubMed ID: 22403842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Silicone breast implants may be close to US approval. Ault A Lancet; 2003 Oct; 362(9393):1384. PubMed ID: 14594002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The FDA defense: a prescription for easing the pain of punitive damage awards in medical products liability cases. Marthaler AL Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 Sep; (223):9-45. PubMed ID: 10173273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco: snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Siegel M Tob Control; 2004 Dec; 13(4):439-41. PubMed ID: 15564633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of FDA medical device regulation as it relates to deep brain stimulation devices. Peña C; Bowsher K; Costello A; De Luca R; Doll S; Li K; Schroeder M; Stevens T IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 17894274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Neraas MB Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Devices and the food and drug administration. Phillips SJ; Phillips RS Artif Organs; 2005 May; 29(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 15854210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: medical devices. Issue brief. Berry MD Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2012 Dec; ():1-35. PubMed ID: 23297445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Semper fidelis--consumer protection for patients with implanted medical devices. Maisel WH N Engl J Med; 2008 Mar; 358(10):985-7. PubMed ID: 18322280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who should protect the public? The Supreme Court and medical device regulation. Korobkin R N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(17):1680-1. PubMed ID: 17960010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal overprotection. Friedman JH Med Health R I; 2004 Oct; 87(10):294. PubMed ID: 15559378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. License to maim: federal pre-emption and the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Petrella ME Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):349-89. PubMed ID: 10178392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Who will hear? An examination of the regulation of hearing aids. Adams SB J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1995; 11(2):505-21. PubMed ID: 10143061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Achieving medical device safety in an era of globalization. Meritz JK; White TL Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(3):647-55. PubMed ID: 19031664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US regulation of combination products. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2009 Oct; 20(6):22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 20302139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consumer gene tests poised for regulatory green light. Mullard A Nat Med; 2012 Sep; 18(9):1306. PubMed ID: 22961137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Postmarket surveillance. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2002 Jun; 67(109):38878-92. PubMed ID: 12053947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Off-label use of medical devices in radiology: regulatory standards and recent developments. Smith JJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2010; 7(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 20142085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]