BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24443667)

  • 1. COMPRESSED SENSING BASED INTENSITY NON-UNIFORMITY CORRECTION.
    Roy S; Carass A; Prince JL
    Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging; 2011 Dec; 2011():101-104. PubMed ID: 24443667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction of Magnetic Resonance Images using Patches.
    Roy S; Carass A; Bazin PL; Prince JL
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2011 Mar; 7962():79621F. PubMed ID: 25077011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A level set method based on domain transformation and bias correction for MRI brain tumor segmentation.
    Khosravanian A; Rahmanimanesh M; Keshavarzi P; Mozaffari S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2021 Mar; 352():109091. PubMed ID: 33515604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust generative asymmetric GMM for brain MR image segmentation.
    Ji Z; Xia Y; Zheng Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Nov; 151():123-138. PubMed ID: 28946994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective correction of intensity inhomogeneity with sparsity constraints in transform-domain: Application to brain MRI.
    George MM; Kalaivani S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 61():207-223. PubMed ID: 31009687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing.
    Madabhushi A; Udupa JK
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uniform combined reconstruction of multichannel 7T knee MRI receive coil data without the use of a reference scan.
    Chebrolu VV; Kollasch PD; Deshpande V; Grinstead J; Howe BM; Frick MA; Fagan AJ; Benner T; Heidemann RM; Felmlee JP; Amrami KK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 50(5):1534-1544. PubMed ID: 30779475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast algorithm for calculation of inhomogeneity gradient in magnetic resonance imaging data.
    Hui C; Zhou YX; Narayana P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Nov; 32(5):1197-208. PubMed ID: 21031526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI intensity inhomogeneity correction by combining intensity and spatial information.
    Vovk U; Pernus F; Likar B
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):4119-33. PubMed ID: 15470927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intensity Non-uniformity Correction of Magnetic Resonance Images Using a Fuzzy Segmentation Algorithm.
    Shen S; Sandham W; Granat M; Sterr A
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2005; 2005():3035-8. PubMed ID: 17282883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A non-iterative multi-scale approach for intensity inhomogeneity correction in MRI.
    George MM; Kalaivani S; Sudhakar MS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 42():43-59. PubMed ID: 28549883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method for bias field correction of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images minimizing segmentation error.
    Gispert JD; Reig S; Pascau J; Vaquero JJ; García-Barreno P; Desco M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 Jun; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 15108301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method of radio-frequency inhomogeneity correction for brain tissue segmentation in MRI.
    Zhou LQ; Zhu YM; Bergot C; Laval-Jeantet AM; Bousson V; Laredo JD; Laval-Jeantet M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(5):379-89. PubMed ID: 11390192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient level set method for simultaneous intensity inhomogeneity correction and segmentation of MR images.
    Ivanovska T; Laqua R; Wang L; Schenk A; Yoon JH; Hegenscheid K; Völzke H; Liebscher V
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Mar; 48():9-20. PubMed ID: 26741125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rough sets for bias field correction in MR images using contraharmonic mean and quantitative index.
    Banerjee A; Maji P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 32(11):2140-51. PubMed ID: 23912497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intensity inhomogeneity correction of MRI images using InhomoNet.
    Venkatesh V; Sharma N; Singh M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2020 Sep; 84():101748. PubMed ID: 32679471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI.
    Styner M; Brechbühler C; Székely G; Gerig G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Mar; 19(3):153-65. PubMed ID: 10875700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MRI non-uniformity correction through interleaved bias estimation and B-spline deformation with a template.
    Fletcher E; Carmichael O; Decarli C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():106-9. PubMed ID: 23365843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative Evaluation of Intensity Inhomogeneity Correction Methods for Structural MR Brain Images.
    Ganzetti M; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
    Neuroinformatics; 2016 Jan; 14(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 26306865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.