These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24444019)

  • 1. Marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding coefficients: an assessment of current methods.
    Wang J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):518-30. PubMed ID: 24444019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of marker-based estimators of inbreeding and inbreeding depression.
    Caballero A; Fernández A; Villanueva B; Toro MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Dec; 54(1):82. PubMed ID: 36575379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use and abuse of genetic marker-based estimates of relatedness and inbreeding.
    Taylor HR
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Aug; 5(15):3140-50. PubMed ID: 26357542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of large marker panels to estimate inbreeding and relatedness: empirical and simulation studies of a pedigreed zebra finch population typed at 771 SNPs.
    Santure AW; Stapley J; Ball AD; Birkhead TR; Burke T; Slate J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1439-51. PubMed ID: 20149098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding.
    Knief U; Kempenaers B; Forstmeier W
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Mar; 118(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 27804967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of family relatedness on characteristics of estimated IBD probabilities in relation to precision of QTL estimates.
    Freyer G; Hernández-Sánchez J; Vukasinovic N
    BMC Genet; 2010 Sep; 11():85. PubMed ID: 20868519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular and pedigree measures of relatedness provide similar estimates of inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population.
    Townsend SM; Jamieson IG
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 23496652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Nov; 119(5):302-313. PubMed ID: 28853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient explains more variation in fitness than heterozygosity at 160 microsatellites in a wild bird population.
    Nietlisbach P; Keller LF; Camenisch G; Guillaume F; Arcese P; Reid JM; Postma E
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Mar; 284(1850):. PubMed ID: 28250184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating Seven Coefficients of Pairwise Relatedness Using Population-Genomic Data.
    Ackerman MS; Johri P; Spitze K; Xu S; Doak TG; Young K; Lynch M
    Genetics; 2017 May; 206(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 28341647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rank-invariant estimation of inbreeding coefficients.
    Zhang QS; Goudet J; Weir BS
    Heredity (Edinb); 2022 Jan; 128(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34824382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure?
    Rousset F
    Heredity (Edinb); 2002 May; 88(5):371-80. PubMed ID: 11986874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2011 Mar; 187(3):887-901. PubMed ID: 21212234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.
    Forstmeier W; Schielzeth H; Mueller JC; Ellegren H; Kempenaers B
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jul; 21(13):3237-49. PubMed ID: 22554318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of founder-specific inbreeding depression on birth weight in Ripollesa lambs.
    Casellas J; Piedrafita J; Caja G; Varona L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 18791149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.